Is Torque Determined by Centripetal or Tangential Acceleration?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haynes Kwon
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 3K views
Haynes Kwon
Gold Member
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Since F=Δp/Δt...

Δp=mΔv+vΔm, Δm=0
Δp=mΔv

Therefore, Δp/Δt=mΔv/Δt=ma.
And if I multiply 'r' to both sides

rF=rma, which is τ=rma

My question is: is 'a' centripetal acceleration or is it tangential acceleration?
If 'a' is centripetal acceleration, which is v^2/r, τ=rmv^2/r=mv^2?

Also I don't really get what tangential acceleration is...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Haynes Kwon said:
Since F=Δp/Δt...

Δp=mΔv+vΔm, Δm=0
Δp=mΔv

Therefore, Δp/Δt=mΔv/Δt=ma.
And if I multiply 'r' to both sides

rF=rma, which is τ=rma

My question is: is 'a' centripetal acceleration or is it tangential acceleration?
Tangential

Haynes Kwon said:
Also I don't really get what tangential acceleration is...
Perpendicular to centripetal (if the path is a circle).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haynes Kwon
Thank you very much. But may I ask why?
 
The torque is an axial vector quantity, i.e., it is defined by
$$\vec{\tau}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}.$$
Here, ##\vec{r}## is the radius vector from a fixed point (with respect to which you want to calculate the torque) and ##\vec{F}## the force acting on the particle. Obviously the torque is perpendicular to the plane spanned by ##\vec{r}## and ##\vec{F}##, and it's 0 whenever ##\vec{F} \propto \vec{r}##.

Defining the angular momentum as
$$\vec{L}=\vec{r} \times \vec{p}=m \vec{r} \times \dot{\vec{r}},$$
you get
$$\dot{\vec{L}}=m \dot{\vec{r}} \times \dot{\vec{r}}+m \vec{r} \times \ddot{\vec{r}}=m \vec{r} \times \ddot{\vec{r}}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}=\vec{\tau}.$$

Particularly this shows that for central forces, i.e., for ##\vec{F} \propto \vec{r}## the angular momentum is conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haynes Kwon
Thank you so much.
So you mean that τ=mv^2 is correct?
 
vanhees71 said:
No. I said ##\vec{\tau}=\vec{r} \times \vec{F}##!
Perhaps I can help clarify to @Haynes Kwon . When the symbol ## \times ## is used between two vectors, it means vector cross product. If the two vectors are parallel or anti-parallel, the result is zero. The two vectors get the maximum cross product when they are perpendicular. In the case of an object moving in a circle, the centripetal force (## F=\frac{mv^2}{r} ##) supplies zero torque because ## \vec{r} \times \vec{F}=0 ##. The vectors ## \vec{r} ## and ## \vec{F} ## lie along the same line=they are anti-parallel, so their vector coss product is zero. Note: For a vector cross product, ## | \vec{A} \times \vec{B} |=|\vec{A}||\vec{B}|sin(\theta) ## where ## \theta ## is the angle between the two vectors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Haynes Kwon and vanhees71
Haynes Kwon said:
Since F=Δp/Δt...

Δp=mΔv+vΔm, Δm=0
Δp=mΔv

Therefore, Δp/Δt=mΔv/Δt=ma.
And if I multiply 'r' to both sides

rF=rma, which is τ=rma

My question is: is 'a' centripetal acceleration or is it tangential acceleration?
If 'a' is centripetal acceleration, which is v^2/r, τ=rmv^2/r=mv^2?

Also I don't really get what tangential acceleration is...
[1st point]
We have:
\vec {Δp} =m( \vec Δv )+ ( \vec v )Δm, Δm=/=0, Δm="change in mass".
We can hypothesise that this "transfer of mass"Δm[x]+"change in internal mass distribution"Δm[r], in general.
So, we may have Δm=0 superficially, but Δm=Δm[x]+Δm[r] , in reality. (x='linear measure', r='radial measure')
To clarify, there may be cases Δm=Δm[x] [ii] Δm=Δm[r] [iii] Δm=0.

[2nd point]
Considering case [iii], (which makes sense for circular motion as the mass always returns to the same point):

We take the 'cross product' between the 'pair of vectors': \tilde P={ \vec r , \vec F } ;
such that: \vec r X \vec F = |r| |F| sin(θ) ( \hat n ) , where \hat n ="unit normal vector" to \tilde P .

So, for case [iii], we really have: \tilde τ = |r| |F| sin(θ) ( \hat n ) = |r| m|a| sin(θ) ( \hat n )
The acceleration resultant is comes from the vector addition of nutational (3d only), centripetal 'r' and tangential 'θ' components. We will consider only the latter 2 components, thus: \vec a = \vec a r + \vec a θ

From Newton's Principia, we have:
\vec a r = \dot v θ = \frac { \vec dv θ } {dt} = ( \frac v 2 , R ) \hat r ; with variable R=|r| , v=| \vec v θ | = ωR
and \vec a_θ = \dot{ \vec v r } = \frac { d \vec v r } {dt}.

We could put \vec v r = 0 for circular motion, or ; for simple harmonic motion r could vary sinusoidally wrt t,
so that: r= r 0 sin ( ω r t ) ,
and: vec v r = \frac { \vec r} {dt} =\frac {d ( r 0 sin ( ω r t ) \hat r )} {dt}
⇒ vec v r = ω r r 0 cos ( ω r t ) \hat r +r 0 sin ( ω r t) \frac { d \hat r } {dt}
... substitute \hat r = \vec r / |r| and work out the derivative wrt t , then find \dot{ \vec v r }

By letting |a|=a , we have: \tilde τ = R m a sin(θ) ( \hat n )
The centripetal component can be considered transversal as it varies 'up and down'.

We get a from the sum of the squares of the transversal and tangential components.
 
Last edited: