Is Using Absolute Value for Infinity Common Practice in Limits?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the notation of using absolute values for infinity in limits, specifically in the expression \lim_{x \to 0}\frac{1}{x} = \left| \infty \right|. Participants unanimously agree that this notation is incorrect and reflects a misunderstanding of limits in mathematics. The correct approach involves recognizing that the limit does not exist as a single value, and should be expressed as \lim_{x \to 0^+}{\frac{1}{x}}=\infty and \lim_{x \to 0^-}{\frac{1}{x}}=-\infty. The discussion highlights the importance of precise mathematical notation and understanding the behavior of limits from both sides of a point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with the concept of infinity in mathematics
  • Knowledge of one-sided limits
  • Basic mathematical notation and expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of one-sided limits in calculus
  • Learn about the projective reals and their application in limits
  • Explore the differences between extended reals and projective reals
  • Review mathematical notation standards in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of limits and mathematical notation.

blunkblot
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I came across a book which looks at a problem like

\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{1}{x}

So you approach from 0-, and get -∞, approach from 0+, get ∞

Then it would write the answer as

\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{1}{x} = \left| \infty \right|

It looks bizarre to me. How do you parse this? Is this common practice or just bad notation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bad, uncommon, bizarre notation. I have never seen it before.
 
If you use the projective reals instead of the extended reals, the limit exists. It's possible that that book uses that notation to indicate that it's using the infinite element of the former, rather than one of the two infinite elements of the latter. But I too have never seen that before.
 
you can get negative infinite. Why you taking the absolute value of it?

Although, the slope will eventually equal the same as you approach 0 from either direction
 
Last edited:
Presumably the book is using the absolute value to indicate that the solution includes both -inf and +inf. That's how I read it, but I'm happy to know I'm not the only one who finds it bizarre.
 
What book is it?
 
\lim_{x \to 0}\frac{1}{x} = \left|\infty\right|
This expression is blatantly incorrect and shows that the author has a basic misunderstanding of mathematics.

What he probably means, if you could write it like that, is:
\left| \lim_{x \to 0}{\frac{1}{x}}\right|=\infty

But you can't. An expression has one definite value, and \lim_{x \to 0}{\frac{1}{x}} doesn't exist. One has to write:
\lim_{x \to 0^+}{\frac{1}{x}}=\infty
\lim_{x \to 0^-}{\frac{1}{x}}=-\infty
 
Or
\lim_{x\to 0}\left|\frac{1}{x}\right|=\infty
:)
 
that works
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K