Is Work Done by Gravity Equal to Change in Potential Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hb20007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Sliding
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between work done by gravity and changes in potential energy, particularly in scenarios involving angles and non-vertical motion. Participants explore the implications of using different equations for work and potential energy in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of using the formula W = mgh in non-vertical situations and question the assumptions behind the relationship between work and potential energy. There is an exploration of how the angle of motion affects the calculations and interpretations of work done by gravity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the conditions under which certain equations apply, particularly highlighting the need for caution when dealing with angles. There is an ongoing examination of the implications of these insights for the original poster's understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific options from a set of answers, indicating that the problem may involve multiple-choice elements. There is also mention of a pendulum scenario, suggesting a broader application of the concepts being discussed.

hb20007
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



It's in the picture attached...

Homework Equations



None...

The Attempt at a Solution



I picked options 2, 5 and 7 to be true but 2 turned out to be false. I can't figure out why it's wrong and an explanation would be appreciated. I mean it makes sense to me because work done by gravity is F*s which is (m*g)*h which is the same as the formula for gravitational potential energy, U = mgh
 

Attachments

  • Which Statements are True.jpg
    Which Statements are True.jpg
    25.6 KB · Views: 423
Physics news on Phys.org
i assume that you were using W=mgh and U=mgh? this is only correct when it is vertical, but since there is an angle θ, you need to use that other Work equation (W=Fdcos θ) which means that potential energy is not the same as Work. again, that would only be true if it were vertical such as a raindrop.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Got it. Thanks
 
Another Question !

Eagle's Wings said:
i assume that you were using W=mgh and U=mgh? this is only correct when it is vertical, but since there is an angle θ, you need to use that other Work equation (W=Fdcos θ) which means that potential energy is not the same as Work. again, that would only be true if it were vertical such as a raindrop.

I was thinking of applying this logic to a pendulum situation.

Let's say the pendulum is in motion and is at a certain moment in time at an angle of 45° to the vertical. I know that the work done by the tension is 0 as it's tangential to the direction of motion. What about the work done by gravity until the point where the pendulum is vertical?

Is it mgh or mgh*sin θ? I think it's just mgh because the equation for work done by gravity was given to me as mg(L-L*cos θ) where L = Length of string at that moment in time and it follows that (L-L*cos θ) is = h.

If it indeed is mgh, then it looks like we have assumed that the force of gravity only does work in the downwards direction. As tension does no work, what force does work in the direction of motion??
 
hb20007 said:
I picked options 2, 5 and 7 to be true but 2 turned out to be false. I can't figure out why it's wrong and an explanation would be appreciated. I mean it makes sense to me because work done by gravity is F*s which is (m*g)*h which is the same as the formula for gravitational potential energy, U = mgh
Pay careful attention to the wording of option 2. When the block slides down, is the work done by gravity positive or negative? Is the change in potential energy positive or negative?
 
Eagle's Wings said:
i assume that you were using W=mgh and U=mgh? this is only correct when it is vertical, but since there is an angle θ, you need to use that other Work equation (W=Fdcos θ) which means that potential energy is not the same as Work. again, that would only be true if it were vertical such as a raindrop.
Note that h = d cosθ, so the two expressions for work are equivalent.
 
Doc Al said:
Note that h = d cosθ, so the two expressions for work are equivalent.

Oh. Does this mean that Eagle's answer was wrong and that the reason answer 2 is false is not because the formula of work is not mgh as Eagle argued but because change in potential energy is equal to - (work done by gravity) and not equal to work done by gravity itself?
 
hb20007 said:
Oh. Does this mean that Eagle's answer was wrong and that the reason answer 2 is false is not because the formula of work is not mgh as Eagle argued but because change in potential energy is equal to - (work done by gravity) and not equal to work done by gravity itself?
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K