Is x^22 - 3x^11 + 2 Irreducible?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter catcherintherye
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The polynomial \( x^{22} - 3x^{11} + 2 \) can be factorized as \( (x^{11} - 2)(x^{11} - 1) \). The factor \( x^{11} - 2 \) satisfies Eisenstein's criterion, confirming its irreducibility. The factor \( x^{11} - 1 \) has \( x - 1 \) as a root, and through long division, it simplifies to \( x^{10} + x^9 + ... + x + 1 \). This polynomial can also be shown to be irreducible by substituting \( y = x + 1 \) and applying Eisenstein's criterion, which is a general approach for polynomials of the form \( \frac{x^p - 1}{x - 1} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Eisenstein's criterion for irreducibility
  • Polynomial long division techniques
  • Understanding of binomial coefficients
  • Basic polynomial factorization methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Eisenstein's criterion in-depth for various polynomial forms
  • Practice polynomial long division with different degrees
  • Explore the implications of substituting variables in polynomial equations
  • Investigate the general case of irreducibility for polynomials of the form \( \frac{x^p - 1}{x - 1} \)
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and anyone interested in polynomial factorization and irreducibility proofs.

catcherintherye
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
factorize [tex]x^{22} -3x^{11} + 2[/tex]

right so I have p(x) = (x^11 -2)(x^11 - 1)

(x^11 -2) satifies eisentstein, obviously x-1 is a factor of the second factor. Long division reaps [tex]x^{10} + x^9 +...+x + 1[/tex]

the solution asserts that this is also irreducible, but I do not see this?? Is this one of those where you substitue x for y+1??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Formatting tip: use curly braces {} to group the entire exponent together as one unit.
 
Yea, any polynomial of the form (x^p-1)/(x-1) can be shown to be irreducible by making the substitution y=x+1 and applying Eisenstein's criteria. You have to do a little work with binomial coefficients, and it's probably easier to prove this general case then the case p=11.
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K