Is Your Non-linear DE Still Not Exact After Integrating Factor Adjustment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ifly2hi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a non-linear first-order differential equation (DE) presented in the form of a differential expression. The original poster attempts to determine whether the DE is exact after applying an integrating factor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the process of checking for exactness and the application of integrating factors. The original poster describes their attempts to manipulate the equation and questions the correctness of their steps. Others raise concerns about the application of the integrating factor and the resulting expressions for M and N.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to clarify the steps taken in the solution process. Some participants provide guidance on the proper multiplication of terms by the integrating factor, while others seek further clarification on specific calculations and expressions derived from the DE.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a specific initial condition, y(0)=1, and the need for careful handling of expressions to ensure the correct application of mathematical principles. Participants are exploring the implications of their calculations and the definitions involved in the problem.

ifly2hi
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Cannot prove the DE is exact??

Hey guys I am looking at a non-linear first order DE. the problem is : (y^2)/2+2*y*exp^(x) +(y+exp^(x))dy/dx=exp^(-x) y(0)=1. I put everything on the same side: ((y^2)/2+2*y*exp^(x)-exp^(-x))dx+(y+exp^(x))dy=0. This equation is not exact so I use (My-Nx)/N and got a function of x alone that equaled 1. Put it into exp^(∫1dx)=exp^(x); took this and multiplied it my N and still M=(y^2)/2+2*y*exp^(x)-exp^(-x) and the "new" N=exp^(2*x)+y*exp^(x): and still My≠Nx. It is still not exact and i have no idea where to go from here? help
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Please use the template when posting here, and try to make your post easier to read. I did a little reformatting and clean-up for you.

Homework Statement



Hey guys. I'm looking at a non-linear, first-order DE. The problem is:
$$\frac{y^2}{2} + 2ye^x + (y+e^x)\frac{dy}{dx} = e^{-x}$$ with y(0)=1.

Homework Equations



(My-Nx)/N

The Attempt at a Solution



I put everything on the same side:
$$\left(\frac{y^2}{2} + 2ye^x-e^{-x}\right)dx + (y+e^x)dy = 0.$$This equation is not exact, so I used (My-Nx)/N and got a function of x alone that equaled 1. Put it into exp^(∫1dx)=exp^(x); took this and multiplied it my N and still M=(y^2)/2+2*y*exp^(x)-exp^(-x) and the "new" N=exp^(2*x)+y*exp^(x). Still My≠Nx. It is still not exact and i have no idea where to go from here? help
You don't multiply N and not M by the integrating factor. You have to multiply both because you're multiplying the equation by the integrating factor.
$$e^x\left(\frac{y^2}{2} + 2ye^x-e^{-x}\right)\,dx + e^x(y+e^x)\,dy = 0$$ If you check the new M and N in that equation, you'll find it's now exact.
 


Yeap... that was a rookie mistake on my part. I do have another question: I have solved the problem down to the point where [itex]∂F/∂x[/itex]=(2ye2x+y2ex-2x)/2+A(y) and [itex]∂F/∂y[/itex]=ex(y+ex)→e2x+A'(y) am I correct in answering A'(y)=yex because it is the only variable of y in [itex]∂F/∂y[/itex] which i would then intergrate to find A(y)=(y2ex)/2 + C and put this back in the equation for [itex]∂F/∂x[/itex] and solve to the constant C?
 


Can you show your work in more detail? I'm not sure what you're doing. Your expression for ##\partial F/\partial x## isn't correct, and I'm not sure where you got ##e^{2x}+A'(y)## from.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K