Is Z[T]/(T^3) a Field Due to T^3's Irreducibility?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter peteryellow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime Radical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Z[T]/(T^3) is not a field because T^3 is not irreducible over Z[T]. The discussion clarifies that the prime and Jacobson radicals in Z[T]/(T^3) are related to the nilpotent elements of the ring. Specifically, the prime radical consists of all nilpotent elements, while the Jacobson radical is the intersection of maximal ideals. Understanding the ideal structure of R/I, where R is a ring and I is an ideal, is crucial for identifying prime and maximal ideals in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and ideals
  • Familiarity with prime and maximal ideals
  • Knowledge of nilpotent elements in rings
  • Concept of Jacobson and prime radicals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the structure of Z[T] and its ideals
  • Learn about nilpotent elements in commutative rings
  • Explore the concept of localization of rings at powers of elements
  • Investigate the relationship between prime ideals and nilpotent elements
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying abstract algebra, particularly those interested in ring theory and ideal structures.

peteryellow
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
I want to find prime and jacobson radical radicals in Z[T]/(T^3), here Z = integers.

Is it true that Z[T]/(T^3) is a field, because T^3 is irreducibel over Z[T]. If it is true that
Z[T]/(T^3) is a field then 0 is the prime and jacobson radical radical.

Is it true please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No T^3 is not irreducible, so can some body help me that how does prime and maximal ideals in Z[T]/(T^3) look like.
 
Think about this abstractly: if R is a ring with an ideal I, what can you say about the ideal structure of R/I?
 
if x is nilpotent, i.e. some positive power of x is zero, then what prime ideals does x lie in?what about the converse question? if x is not nilpotent, can you find a prime ideal not containing x? (do you know about localizing a ring at powers of an element?)
 
No I don't understand what you are saying mathwonk. My definition of jacobson radical is that it is intersection of maximal ideals and prime radical iks intersection of prime radical.
 
mathwonk is alluding to the fact that the prime radical of (a commutative ring) R is nothing but the set of all nilpotent elements in R. The same comment applies to the Jacobson radical of R whenever R is finitely-generated (as a Z-module).
 
But Morphism can you please tell me that what are prime and maximal ideals of the ring, and how can I FIND THEM. PLEASE HELP. THNAKS
 
But why? mathwonk's method is much more elegant.
 
the point is that if you are looking for prime ideals you should look at nilpotent elements.
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K