Isentropic Process and Reversible Process

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the definitions and relationships between isentropic and totally reversible processes. A totally reversible process requires both internal and external reversibility, while an isentropic process is defined as being internally reversible and adiabatic. The participants conclude that a totally reversible process may not be isentropic due to heat transfer, and that isentropic processes can exhibit internal irreversibility. Additionally, the nuances of reversible processes are emphasized, suggesting that terminology should be used with precision to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic processes, specifically isentropic and reversible processes.
  • Familiarity with concepts of internal and external reversibility.
  • Knowledge of adiabatic processes and their implications in thermodynamics.
  • Basic principles of entropy and its role in thermodynamic cycles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and implications of "internally reversible" and "externally reversible" processes in thermodynamics.
  • Explore the concept of adiabatic processes and their significance in isentropic transformations.
  • Investigate the Carnot cycle and its relationship to reversible and isentropic processes.
  • Learn about the implications of entropy changes in cyclic processes and their effect on the environment.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying the principles of heat transfer and entropy in physical systems.

noobie_doobie
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Will like to check if my below thoughts are right:

1) For a totally reversible process, it has to be both internally and externally reversible. And the definition of externally reversible means heat transfer between a system and reservoir where the temperature are the same.

2) For an isentropic process, it has to be internally reversible and adiabatic.

From the above 2 definition, can i say that
A) For a totally reversible process, it will not be isentropic since it involve heat transfer, albeit the temperature difference is infinitisimal small.(based on definition of externally reversible)

B) An isentropic process is not a totally reversible process but only an internally reversible process


For another question on the same topic, in an adiabatic reversible expansion of a piston system( i.e isentropic) , can I visualise the reason this process is seen as isentropic is because although the volume increases, meaning the molecules are more random(increase entropy), the counter effect is brought about by the reduction in pressure and temperature, hence slowing down the molecule speed, resulting in a zero entropy change??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
noobie_doobie said:
Hi all,

Will like to check if my below thoughts are right:

1) For a totally reversible process, it has to be both internally and externally reversible. And the definition of externally reversible means heat transfer between a system and reservoir where the temperature are the same.

2) For an isentropic process, it has to be internally reversible and adiabatic.

From the above 2 definition, can i say that
A) For a totally reversible process, it will not be isentropic since it involve heat transfer, albeit the temperature difference is infinitisimal small.(based on definition of externally reversible)

B) An isentropic process is not a totally reversible process but only an internally reversible process


For another question on the same topic, in an adiabatic reversible expansion of a piston system( i.e isentropic) , can I visualise the reason this process is seen as isentropic is because although the volume increases, meaning the molecules are more random(increase entropy), the counter effect is brought about by the reduction in pressure and temperature, hence slowing down the molecule speed, resulting in a zero entropy change??

I don't quite understand how you conclude that isoentropic process is not reversible

Yes to the "another question"
 
I think maybe it is good to define that the only kind of reversible processes are a)internally reversible, b)externally reversible and c)totally reversible. We should avoid using the term general term 'reversible process' as in many websites since there are subtle differences between each reversible process which have to be considered.

Going back to my conclusion in point B) that isentropic process is not totally reversible, this is because the process might have internal irreversibility but is negated through heat transfer. Hence, with internal irreversibility, the process is no more totally reversible. One question, although the process is isentropic for this case, does it implies that the surrounding has be to isentropic too??

As for my statement A), maybe I will rephrase to say that
i) for a totally reversible single path process, it might not be isentropic since it involve heat transfer, albeit the temperature difference is infinitisimal small.(based on definition of externally reversible). This can be seen from the isothermal expansion in Carnot cycle, which is a totally reversible process, yet not isentropic.

ii) for a totally reversible single path process, only an adiabatic expansion is isentropic, as seen from adiabatic expansion in Carnot Cycle.

iii) only a cyclic process, consisting of totally reversible single path processes, will result in a zero entropy change to the system and environment.
A cyclic process, consisting a mixture of totally reversible single path and isentropic(not necessary reversible) single path, might cause the system to have zero entropy change but not the environment.
 
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
10K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K