Isomorphic Subgroup Action on a Group: Proving the Isomorphism between H^g and H

  • Thread starter Thread starter lion8172
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group Subgroup
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the isomorphic subgroup action of a group G on a subgroup H results in H^g being isomorphic to H. The participant attempts to establish this by analyzing the kernel of the action map σ(g, *): H → H^g, concluding that the kernel is trivial, which leads to the application of the first isomorphism theorem. However, it is clarified that H^g is not universally a group, as it depends on the specific type of action, such as conjugation, thus invalidating the proof in general cases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically subgroup actions.
  • Familiarity with the first isomorphism theorem in abstract algebra.
  • Knowledge of kernel definitions in the context of group homomorphisms.
  • Experience with specific group actions, such as conjugation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of group actions and their implications on subgroup structures.
  • Learn about the first isomorphism theorem and its applications in group theory.
  • Investigate different types of group actions, particularly conjugation and its effects on subgroups.
  • Explore examples of isomorphic subgroup actions in various groups to solidify understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, group theorists, and anyone interested in the properties of subgroup actions within group theory.

lion8172
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to prove that, if H is a subgroup of an arbitrary group G, then H^g, the action of a given element in G on H, is isomorphic to H.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let \sigma denote a given action of G on H. We are considering the map \sigma(g, *) : H -> H^g (where g is fixed and * denotes a variable element of H). I think that the kernel of this map is the set of all elements x in H such that \sigma(g, x) = g (this is the part I'm not sure of). Since x lies in H and H is a subgroup of G, it follows that x must be equal to e, the identity element of G. Thus, ker{\sigma(g, x)} is trivial, and, as a result,
[tex]H^g \cong G/ \mbox{ker}(\sigma(g, *)) = G,[/tex]
by the first isomorphism theorem.
Does this seem correct? If so, can you please justify the statement that
[tex]\mbox{ker} \sigma(g, *) = \{ x| \sigma(g, x) = g \ \forall x \in H \}[/tex]?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
lion8172 said:
H^g, the action of a given element in G on H, is isomorphic to H.
This doesn't make sense - an action is not a group. To have any chance of solving this problem correctly, you should write down what H^g actually is.
 
H^g would be a group in certain cases (i.e. conjugation), but not in others. So the proof above certainly does not apply in general.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K