Iterated Integration with a fraction

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a user seeking assistance with the iterated integration of the equation ∫ylnx/x from e^y to y for dx, expressing difficulty with the fraction involved. They initially attempted U-substitution but found it complicated, leading to frustration due to a lack of practice with alternate integration methods. A suggestion to use the substitution u=ln(x) was made, which simplifies the integration process significantly. The user realized that this approach effectively addresses their concerns about the fraction, acknowledging their previous experience with similar problems. Ultimately, they expressed gratitude for the help and recognized the need to manage their time better for future assignments.
Millenniumf
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I need help with Iterated Integration. I'm trying to integrate the following equation:

∫ylnx/x from e^y to y for dx, y>0

(sorry about the messy equation; first time user)

I know how to integrate ln, but the fraction has me thrown for a loop. I tried U-substitution, but the equation kept getting messier. To be clear, I'm out of practice with some of the alternate methods for integration, so I may not be considering something (I planned on practicing them over the summer, but I got a job and my time got eaten away).

Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you try the rather obvious substitution: u= ln(x)?
 
Yes; it's the fraction I'm having a problem with, though. I am not sure why, though. I've done them before. This semester though I haven't run into them often, and the ones I've seen were done in class as example problems (the teacher picks from his homework assignments).

I do have integration tables in the back of the book. I'll try those and see if one of them matches.
 
Hello Millenniumf,

Welcome to PF.

The substitution suggested by HallsofIvy takes care of the "fraction" very nicely.

\displaystyle \int\frac{\ln(x)}{x}dx

Let u=ln(x), then du = ?
 
Last edited:
Huh, it's obvious now! u=ln(x), du=(1/x), then I just input e^y and y and complete the problem.

I think my brain must have been fried from pulling an all-nighter getting my assignment completed; I've done more complex u-sub problems before with no complications.

I think I better start earlier in the day with future assignments.

Thank you for the help!
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K