[itex]\int\frac{n}{(n^{2}+1)^{2}}[/itex]= itself w/ Partial Fractions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of the function \(\int\frac{n}{(n^{2}+1)^{2}}\) and the challenges faced when attempting to evaluate it using partial fractions. Participants explore why the application of partial fractions leads back to the original function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of partial fractions and question why it does not lead to a different expression. Some mention using substitution methods instead, while others express confusion regarding the results obtained from different methods.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various participants suggesting alternative methods such as substitution instead of partial fractions. There is acknowledgment of differing results from integration attempts, and some participants are exploring the implications for series evaluation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's intent was to create a telescoping series from the function, raising questions about the limitations of partial fractions in this context. There is also mention of discrepancies in results from different integration techniques.

Lebombo
Messages
144
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Why when I try to evaluate this with Partial Fractions, why do I end up with the original function?
[itex]\int\frac{n}{(n^{2}+1)^{2}}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{n}{(n^{2}+1)(n^{2}+1)}[/itex]

[itex]\frac{Ax+B}{n^{2}+1} + \frac{Cx+D}{(n^{2}+1)^{2}}[/itex]

1n = (An+B)(n^{2}+1) + Cx + D

[itex]0n^{3}+ 0n^{2} + 1n + 0n^{0} = n^{3}(A) + n^{2}(B) + n(A+C) + n^{0}(B+D)[/itex]

A=0 B=0 C=1 D=0

[itex]\frac{0n+0}{n^{2}+1} + \frac{1n+0}{(n^{2}+1)^{2}}[/itex]

= 0 + [itex]\frac{n}{(n^{2}+1)^{2}}[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That website looks all scrambled up. Nothing seems to be aligned. Which part pertains to why this particular function ends up to simply be itself?

By the way, when I do u-sub on this function I get 1/4 and when I do partial fractions I get -1/4. Is that a sign mistake?

Also, the basis for this question was actually in regards to the series of the function in question.

I was trying to do partial fractions to create a telescoping function to evaluate the series. But partial fractions doesn't separate this function into telescoping series.

So my follow up questions is: Why does this function not separate into a telescoping form if Partial fractions can be applied to it?
 
Lebombo,
What you're saying doesn't make a lot of sense. As you've seen, partial fractions leads you right back to the exact same integrand, so I don't see how you were able to carry out the integration that way. Substitution is the way to go here.

The integral looks like it would be amenable to a trig substitution, but that seems like a lot of work when an ordinary substitution would do the trick.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Lebombo said:
That website looks all scrambled up. Nothing seems to be aligned. Which part pertains to why this particular function ends up to simply be itself?

The site works fine with Chrome on my laptop. Check your browser!

The website page goes over the method in detail, with a few examples. A review of the method may help you to find any problems with your technique.


Wolfram Alpha says: ## n^2/(n^2+1) = 1-1/(n^2+1) ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
IDK why you want to use partial fractions anyway. You've plainly got a case for a u substitution, no partial fractions or trig substitution required.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I don't see the need of a trig substitution. There is a very obvious substitution you can use as SteamKing has said.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
I just [thought I] saw an opportunity to practice a partial fraction from the past chapter while working on series.

Thanks all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K