Jerk, Jounce, Snap, Crackle, Pop: What's the Motion?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter James Beck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    acceleration jerk
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concepts of Jerk, Jounce, and higher order derivatives in motion analysis. Jerk is defined as the rate of change of acceleration, while Jounce is the rate of change of Jerk. These higher order derivatives are relevant in precision engineering applications, such as the design of the Hubble Space Telescope and camshafts. Although theoretically, one can continue deriving higher order derivatives, practical applications limit their usefulness beyond a certain point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, particularly derivatives.
  • Familiarity with classical mechanics and Newtonian physics.
  • Knowledge of motion analysis in engineering contexts.
  • Experience with precision engineering applications, such as aerospace or automotive design.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the applications of Jerk and Jounce in precision engineering.
  • Explore the mathematical implications of higher order derivatives in motion analysis.
  • Study the role of derivatives in classical and relativistic mechanics.
  • Investigate the design principles of camshafts and their relation to motion dynamics.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and students interested in advanced motion analysis and precision design in fields such as aerospace and automotive engineering.

James Beck
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I read that the rate of change of acceleration is called Jerk, and the rate of change of Jerk is called Jounce. I guess sometimes these higher order derivatives are used when designing extremely precise equipment, like the Hubble or someone on this form said camshaft design. We can even talk about higher order derivatives of Jounce, but I can see how these would not be useful in most situations. In the real world there is probably no such thing is perfectly constant acceleration, jerk, jounce, snap, crackle, and pop. Could you just keep taking higher order derivatives forever to describe motion? Is this just the same thing as asking what is the smallest possible delta t?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
James Beck said:
Could you just keep taking higher order derivatives forever to describe motion?
Yes in theory, but in practice for any particular system there becomes no point after a while.
James Beck said:
Is this just the same thing as asking what is the smallest possible delta t?
No. In both classical (Newtonian) and relativistic mechanics there is no smallest possible Δt (time is continuous).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K