Jobs speech: YouTube of full 33 minutes

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jobs Youtube
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on President Obama's Jobs Act and its implications for the U.S. economy. Participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of the Act, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive strategy to address unemployment and infrastructure issues. Key points include the necessity of short-term unemployment benefits, the importance of corporate tax reform, and the urgency of investing in infrastructure to stimulate job creation. The conversation highlights a divide on fiscal policy, with some advocating for immediate stimulus spending while others call for spending cuts to stabilize the economy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the American Jobs Act and its objectives
  • Familiarity with corporate tax structures and their impact on the economy
  • Knowledge of infrastructure investment and its role in job creation
  • Awareness of fiscal policy debates surrounding government spending and deficit reduction
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of the American Jobs Act on unemployment rates
  • Explore corporate tax reform proposals and their potential effects on domestic investment
  • Investigate successful infrastructure projects that have led to job creation
  • Analyze fiscal policy strategies for balancing government spending and deficit reduction
USEFUL FOR

Economists, policymakers, political analysts, and anyone interested in understanding the implications of government initiatives on job creation and economic stability.

  • #31
The low interest rates of today will not remain low. Unlike borrower via the personal credit card or car loan, the federal government does not intend to pay off its debts in two or five years, it intends instead to roll over those debts on to new future debt with future interest. rates. So borrowing today with no concern to the future is the Lehman Brothers plan, is reckless, and may lead to similar results.

Edit: A plan to pay off the US debt over 30 years would mean increasing spending by ~$500B a year to pay off the lenders, and that is after zeroing the current $1.6T deficit immediately.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
russ_watters said:
Six weeks. That's all it took for Obama to push us in the opposite direction of the debt deal.

Well, to be fair, the fiscal year is almost over. He needs a new budget in three weeks.

That has other problems: there isn't a President's Budget for FY2012. Well, there was, in February, but a) the Senate voted it down 0-97, and b) in April, the Presidents' speech (of "we don't score speeches" fame) indicated that the President himself was no longer in favor of that budget either.
 
  • #33
Vanadium 50 said:
Well, to be fair, the fiscal year is almost over. He needs a new budget in three weeks.

That has other problems: there isn't a President's Budget for FY2012. Well, there was, in February, but a) the Senate voted it down 0-97, and b) in April, the Presidents' speech (of "we don't score speeches" fame) indicated that the President himself was no longer in favor of that budget either.

It's only fair to give him credit when credit is due - he clearly realized his budget proposal was a bad plan. I'm just not sure if he would agree as to WHY it was a bad plan?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K