Mark David Chapman, the man who killed John Lennon, was denied parole for the fifth time, with the parole board citing concerns for public safety. The discussion revolves around whether the board's reasoning is valid or influenced by public sentiment and the potential for vigilante justice. Some argue that Chapman, having committed the murder for notoriety, poses no further threat, while others believe his calculated actions indicate he remains dangerous. The legality of his parole denial is also debated, emphasizing that all inmates should be treated equally under the law, regardless of the notoriety of their crimes. Concerns about public outcry and the potential for violence against Chapman if released are significant factors in the discussion. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexities of justice, rehabilitation, and societal perceptions of high-profile criminals.