Judge Original Time & Length Special Relativity

In summary, the conversation discusses the twin paradox and how to explain it without using mathematical methods. The speakers suggest using non-mathematical treatments or adjusting expectations. One speaker explains that proper time and length are measured in an inertial frame of reference and that the twin paradox can be understood in terms of the distance traveled through spacetime. Another speaker argues that some level of mathematics is necessary for discussing physics.
  • #1
Barry Z
3
0
TL;DR Summary
How to Judge original time and original length of special relativity
How to Judge original time and original length of special relativity
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
How to explain twin paradox without using mathematical methods?
 
  • #4
Barry Z said:
Summary:: How to Judge original time and original length of special relativity

How to Judge original time and original length of special relativity
Set an IFR first. Proper time for the IFR is measured by clocks at rest. Measures at rest show proper length.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #5
Barry Z said:
How to explain twin paradox without using mathematical methods?
One twin stays in an IFR where time to meet brother again ages more. Another twin transfers IFRs, once at least, that makes his time to meet brother again ages less.
 
Last edited:
  • #6
Barry Z said:
How to explain twin paradox without using mathematical methods?
What do you mean by mathematical methods? Is high school maths ok or do you want absolutely no maths at all?
 
  • #7
In relativity, it turns out that the elapsed time measured by your clock is a measure of "distance" traveled through spacetime. Just like with distance between points in space, the "distance" between two events in spacetime depends on the route taken. The twins took different routes between the departure and return events, so have different elapsed times.

I don't think any of that is provable without maths, but it's the correct explanation.
 
  • #8
It is impossible to talk in a meaningful way about physics without a minimum of math. For the here discussed kinematical effects of the relativistic spacetime model you only need basic linear algebra.
 

1. What is "Judge Original Time & Length Special Relativity"?

"Judge Original Time & Length Special Relativity" is a theory that explains how time and length are relative to the observer's frame of reference and how they can be affected by the speed of an object.

2. Who developed the theory of "Judge Original Time & Length Special Relativity"?

The theory of "Judge Original Time & Length Special Relativity" was developed by Albert Einstein in 1905.

3. How does "Judge Original Time & Length Special Relativity" differ from classical mechanics?

"Judge Original Time & Length Special Relativity" differs from classical mechanics in that it takes into account the speed of light as a constant and shows that time and length are not absolute, but instead relative to the observer's frame of reference.

4. What are the key principles of "Judge Original Time & Length Special Relativity"?

The key principles of "Judge Original Time & Length Special Relativity" include the constancy of the speed of light, the relativity of simultaneity, time dilation, length contraction, and the equivalence of mass and energy.

5. Can "Judge Original Time & Length Special Relativity" be applied to everyday life?

Yes, "Judge Original Time & Length Special Relativity" has been proven to accurately describe the behavior of objects at high speeds and is used in various technologies, such as GPS systems, that rely on precise time measurements.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
54
Views
732
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
876
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
993
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
897
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
32
Views
1K
Back
Top