Just a theory question on the Integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter flyingpig
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Theory
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the formal definition of the integral and the indexing of summation in its formulation. Participants are exploring why the index starts at i = 1 instead of i = 0, particularly in the context of partitioning intervals for integration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the convention of starting the index at 1 and discussing the implications of labeling intervals and endpoints in the context of integration. Some suggest that it is a matter of convention related to counting rectangles formed by partitions.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the reasoning behind the choice of index in the integral definition. Some participants have provided clarifications and analogies, such as the fence post problem, to illustrate the distinction between counting points and spans. However, no explicit consensus has been reached on the best approach to understanding this convention.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the conventions of labeling in mathematical definitions and the potential confusion arising from different indexing methods. There is mention of an article that may provide further clarification, though it has not yet been linked.

flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The formal definition of the integral is

\lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n} f(x_i)\Delta x



The Attempt at a Solution



My question is, why does i = 1? Why don't we start at i = 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
it is just a matter of convention. the definition you give is derived from splitting an area up into little rectangles and summing the area of them. the convention is to begin the labeling of those rectangles with 1. so, when we sum from 1 to n, we get n rectangles, instead of n+1. since we are letting n go to infinity the result would be the same.

one point of confusion might be the labeling of the points vs. the labeling of the intervals (the rectangles). i was recently turned on to an article that really helps clarify this kind of problem. as soon as i figure out how to post a link i will link it.
 
flyingpig said:

Homework Statement



The formal definition of the integral is

\lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=1}^{n} f(x_i)\Delta x

The Attempt at a Solution



My question is, why does i = 1? Why don't we start at i = 0?

The partition is usually labeled:

a = x0<x1...<xn-1<xn = b

There are n intervals and n+1 endpoints. You can label the sum from 1 to n or from 0 to n-1 depending on whether you are using the left or right end point subscript to count with, and label the Δx accordingly.
 
http://betterexplained.com/articles/learning-how-to-count-avoiding-the-fencepost-problem/"

here it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If it is too much to ask, can you draw me a picture...?
 
i will try, but don't laugh!

imagine three fence posts, and label them 0, 1 , 2. like this:

| | |
0 1 2

these are the 'points' on the number line, there are three of them, but they only form two spans of fence.

| 1 | 2 |
0_ 1_ 2

for integration, we want to count the 'spans of fence' (rectangles), not the 'posts' (partition points), so to speak.
 
flyingpig said:
If it is too much to ask, can you draw me a picture...?

When there is more than one person responding to your post, it is a good idea to use the quote button and quote the person you are addressing so they know you are replying to them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K