Justify if a mass is negligible.

  • Thread starter Thread starter thatguythere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the torque equilibrium in a scenario where a man holds a 3 kg object with his arm extended. The torque equilibrium equation is used to calculate the force exerted by the biceps muscle, considering parameters such as arm length (32 cm), distance from the elbow (6 cm), and the angle (75°). The conclusion drawn is that the assumption of the lower arm's mass being negligible is not justified, as the arm's weight (approximately 1.5 kg) significantly impacts the torque and the required biceps force, increasing it by about 25% when included in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque equilibrium equations
  • Knowledge of basic physics concepts related to force and mass
  • Familiarity with integral calculus for advanced calculations
  • Ability to analyze lever systems in biomechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study torque equilibrium equations in detail
  • Learn how to apply integral calculus to biomechanical problems
  • Research the biomechanics of human arm anatomy and weight distribution
  • Explore the effects of varying angles on torque in lever systems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, biomechanics researchers, and anyone interested in understanding the mechanics of human movement and muscle force calculations.

thatguythere
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A standard man holds an object of mass m = 3 kg on the palm of the hand with the arm stretched, as shown in the figure below.
(a) Use the torque equilibrium equation to determine the magnitude of the force F that is exerted by the biceps muscle, when a = 32 cm,b = 6 cm,and the angle θ = 75°.Neglect the weight of the lower arm.
(b) Is the assumption of a negligible mass of the lower arm in part (a) justified?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Part a) I completed with little difficulty, I wish only some dialogue on the second part. The way I see it is that even if the man were not holding a mass in his hand, the weight of the lower arm itself would still exert some force on the bicep. Therefore, the mass is not in fact negligible. Any thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • 6-p-016.gif
    6-p-016.gif
    6.1 KB · Views: 538
Physics news on Phys.org
The mass of the arm would be negligible if the arm's mass was tiny relative to the weight, thus causing a small (negligible) error in your final calculations. Taking the mean value from some data about arm weight found on the internet, a human forearm and hand weigh about 1.5 kg, 50% of the weight of the object held in the hand. Although this weight is distributed across the length of the lever arm, I'd agree that this isn't negligible.

If you know integral calculus, you could to a pretty accurate calculation of the force from the muscle with the added weight of the arm by making an integral for the torque from the arm. If you assume the forearm has uniform mass, then:
\displaystyle dm=(m/L)dx
where the positive x-axis is along the arm, L is arm length, and m is mass of arm. Then:
\displaystyle dF=g\ dm
\displaystyle dτ=x\ dF
then, substitute to get
\displaystyle dτ=\frac{m·g}{L}·x\ dx
then integrate
\displaystyle τ=\frac{m·g}{L}·\int^L_0x\ dx
this gives:
\displaystyle τ=\frac{m·g·L}{2}

This calculation, along with the arm weight data found on the internet, indicates that the arm weight would increase the torque (and thus the force from the bicep) by about 25%.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K