K-beta line for the X-ray spectra of Molybdenum with Moseley

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter super_adun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Spectra X-ray
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on calculating the Kβ line of Molybdenum (Mo, atomic number 42) using Moseley's law. The user initially calculated an emitted energy of 20.321 keV with an incorrect screening constant of 1, while the accepted value is 19.607 keV. Suggestions included using a more accurate screening constant of 1.72 for the Kβ transition, as derived from Slater's rules. The user expressed confusion regarding the calculation of the screening constant when the energy is unknown.

PREREQUISITES
  • Moseley's law for X-ray spectra
  • Understanding of screening constants in atomic physics
  • Slater's rules for calculating effective nuclear charge
  • Basic knowledge of electron transitions between atomic shells
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of Slater's rules for different elements
  • Explore methods for calculating screening constants in atomic physics
  • Study the derivation and implications of Moseley's law
  • Investigate experimental techniques for measuring X-ray emission energies
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, chemists, and students studying atomic structure, particularly those interested in X-ray spectroscopy and the calculation of energy levels in elements like Molybdenum.

super_adun
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This should be easy but I'm totally stuck here.

So I'm calculating the Kβ line (emitted energy) of Molybdenum (Mo 42). I'm using Moseley's law and am moving from the M-shell to the K-shell. Recall Moseley's law is E = 13.6 eV (Z-σ)2 *1/n2. The effective formula for the energy emitted is thus E = 13.6 eV (Z-σ)2 *(1- (⅓2) since I am moving from n = 3 to n = 1. σ is the screening constant of n =3 of Molybdenum. Using a screening constant of 1 (I know this is incorrect, but bare with me) I get that the difference in energy is 20.321 keV. The answer according to all tables I've seen is 19.607 keV.

The only thing I could think was that the error was due to the approximation of the screening constant. Solving the equation backwards for the "table value"of K-beta gives an Zeff of 40.27. I can't fit the screening constant into that equation, since it is 4.15, as calculated with Slater's rules.

Could anybody tell me what I am missing here? I'm super thankful for all the help I can get.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
super_adun said:
The only thing I could think was that the error was due to the approximation of the screening constant. Solving the equation backwards for the "table value"of K-beta gives an Zeff of 40.27. I can't fit the screening constant into that equation, since it is 4.15, as calculated with Slater's rules.

Could anybody tell me what I am missing here? I'm super thankful for all the help I can get.

you may try a screening constant sigma(31) =1,72 for the Kbeta transition and check if you get a correct value
Mo z=42 E (Kalpha)17.48 sigma(21) 0.60
E (K beta)19.61 sigma(31) 1.72

details you can see at :
http://www.ld-didactic.de/literatur/hb/e/p6/p6354_e.pdf
 
drvrm said:
you may try a screening constant sigma(31) =1,72 for the Kbeta transition and check if you get a correct value
Mo z=42 E (Kalpha)17.48 sigma(21) 0.60
E (K beta)19.61 sigma(31) 1.72

details you can see at :
http://www.ld-didactic.de/literatur/hb/e/p6/p6354_e.pdf
Thank you, this would make it exactly right. I'm still not entirely sure how the screening constant (σ) is calculated if the energy E is unknown. How would you do it?
I tried with Slater's rules but I couldn't get it right. Thanks a lot for the help!
 
super_adun said:
I'm still not entirely sure how the screening constant (σ) is calculated if the energy E is unknown. How would you do it?

i have a hunch that a theoretical estimate of screening of the nuclear charge can be made exactly if you know the 'exact' electronic charge distribution- and electronic shell charge distribution is not 'realistic' enough to give correct picture except perhaps s-shells which are spherically symmetric -therefore the experimental estimates of sigma can be used and an average effect of screening is used instead
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K