KE Conservation: Calculating Final Velocities

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating final velocities in a perfectly elastic collision involving a beam and a block. The key equations utilized include the conservation of kinetic energy (KEi = KEf) and conservation of angular momentum (L = mvr). Participants clarify the moment of inertia for the beam, which is derived as I = 1/12 * M * D^2, and emphasize the importance of correctly applying angular momentum and energy equations to solve for the final velocities. The final equations derived are essential for determining the velocities post-collision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy and its conservation in elastic collisions
  • Familiarity with angular momentum and its conservation principles
  • Knowledge of moment of inertia calculations for different shapes
  • Proficiency in algebraic manipulation and solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Learn about the principles of rotational dynamics and angular momentum
  • Explore advanced topics in elastic collisions and energy conservation
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple conservation laws in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and dynamics, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of collision problems in elastic systems.

  • #31
goonking said:
ok, I'm so lost right now.

lets try to clear things up a bit.

the block is moving, hits into the beam.

I'm guessing the beam makes a full revolution and comes back down to the initial position?

then the block moves backwards with a velocity that was less than what it initially was. and since it was going backwards, the velocity is negative.

is everything correct so far?

No. You need to consider the situation just before and after collision. The block had some velocity initially, the rod was in rest.
The block has some angular momentum both before and after the collision. The beam has angular momentum after the collision. The angular momentum before collision is the same as the angular momentum after it.
Also, the initial KE of the block is the same as the KE of the block plus the rotational energy of the beam just after collision.
You do not know the direction of the final velocity of the block. Consider it positive. If it comes out to be negative at the end, it would mean that the block moves backward after the collision.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
it's a bit hard trying to grasp how an object moving linearly can have an angular momentum. anyways:

Kinetic energy :
1/2 m vi^2 = (1/2 m vf^2) +(1/2) (I) (ω^2)angular momentum:

m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( I ω)

I =1/12*M* D^2

=
m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( (1/12*M* D^2) ω)
 
  • #33
goonking said:
it's a bit hard trying to grasp how an object moving linearly can have an angular momentum. anyways:

Kinetic energy :
1/2 m vi^2 = (1/2 m vf^2) +(1/2) (I) (ω^2)angular momentum:

m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( I ω)

I =1/12*M* D^2

=
m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( (1/12*M* D^2) ω)

It is right now. Solve for vf.
 
  • #34
ehild said:
It is right now. Solve for vf.
is this just all algebra now?

how do we eliminate ω?

and D is unknown.
 
  • #35
ehild said:
It is right now. Solve for vf.
shouldn't the M in I =1/12*M* D^2 be 2m?

so
I =1/12*2m* D^2

?
 
  • #36
goonking said:
shouldn't the M in I =1/12*M* D^2 be 2m?

so
I =1/12*2m* D^2

?
D is unknown, solve in terms of it. And yes, the mass of the beam is M=2m
 
  • #37
goonking said:
shouldn't the M in I =1/12*M* D^2 be 2m?
ehild said:
D is unknown, solve in terms of it. And yes, the mass of the beam is M=2m
after doing some algebra in the angular momentum section. i get :

10 = (Vf /2) + ( D ω )

seems right so far?

D = (10- (Vf/2)) / ω
 
Last edited:
  • #38
No, I do not think it is right. And you need vf, not D.
 
  • #39
goonking said:
after doing some algebra in the angular momentum section. i get :

10 = (Vf * 1/2) + ( D ω )

seems right so far?
ehild said:
No, I do not think it is right. And you need vf, not D.
the D's must cancel out somewhere, I'm still trying to figure out where.
 
  • #40
goonking said:
the D's must cancel out somewhere, I'm still trying to figure out where.
Work symbolically. Keep D and isolate omega.
 
  • #41
ehild said:
Work symbolically. Keep D and isolate omega.
ω = (60 D - Vf D) / 2D^2

correct?
 
  • #42
goonking said:
ω = (60 D - Vf D) / 2D^2

correct?
if my algebra is correct, i can simplify more by canceling out the D's to get :

ω = (60 - Vf) / 2?
 
  • #43
It is certainly wrong, Check the dimensions.
 
  • #44
I will continue looking at this problem when i come back from school. hopefully I will see things I didn't see before lol
 
  • #45
goonking said:
Kinetic energy :
1/2 m vi^2 = (1/2 m vf^2) +(1/2) (I) (ω^2)angular momentum:

m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( I ω)

I =1/12*M* D^2

=
m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( (1/12*M* D^2) ω)

These are the correct equations, and M=2m.

From the first equation, you got
ω = (60 D - Vf D) / 2D^2
which is almost correct, but you have an algebraic error.

Substituting ##I=\frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 ## into the angular momentum equation (m vi D/2 )= (m vf D/2) + ( I ω), you get

##m v_i \frac{D}{2}= m v_f \frac{D}{2}+ \frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 \omega ## .

Simplifying, it results in ## v_i - v_f = \frac{1}{3} D \omega ## . I think you made the error when multiplying by the constants.

So you get Dω in terms of the velocities. Working with the energy equation, (Dω )2 appears. Substitute .
 
  • #46
ehild said:
These are the correct eq uations, and M=2m.

From the first equation, you got

which is almost correct, but you have an algebraic error.

Substituting ##I=\frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 ## into the angular momentum equation (m vi D/2 )= (m vf D/2) + ( I ω), you get

##m v_i \frac{D}{2}= m v_f \frac{D}{2}+ \frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 \omega ## .

Simplifying, it results in ## v_i - v_f = \frac{1}{3} D \omega ## . I think you made the error when multiplying by the constants.

So you get Dω in terms of the velocities. Working with the energy equation, (Dω )2 appears. Substitute .
yes, the algebra was very long.

anyways, i got 1/2 m vo 2 = 1/2 m vf2 + 1/2 ((m d2) / 6 ) (3/d (vo - vf))2

1/2's and m's cancel out from each side.

vo2 = vf2 + (d2/6) ((9/d2 (vo - vf)2)

d's cancel out

vo2 = vf2 + (3/2) (vo- vf)2

now do should i foil the (vo- vf)2?
 
Last edited:
  • #47
goonking said:
vo2 = vf2 + (3/2) (vo- vf)2

now do should i foil the (vo- vf)2?

You can substitute the numerical value of vo now. Expand the square and solve the quadratic equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
839
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K