KE Conservation: Calculating Final Velocities

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the conservation of kinetic energy and angular momentum in a perfectly elastic collision scenario, specifically focusing on a beam and a block. The participants explore the relationships between translational and rotational motion, as well as the implications of conservation laws in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of kinetic energy and angular momentum, questioning the correct application of these principles in the context of a rotating beam and a colliding block. There is exploration of the moment of inertia and its relevance to the problem.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants attempting to clarify their understanding of angular momentum and its conservation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the equations needed to solve for the final velocities, but confusion remains about the relationships between the variables involved.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the moment of inertia for the beam and its application in the equations. Participants are also grappling with the implications of the initial conditions and the direction of velocities post-collision.

  • #31
goonking said:
ok, I'm so lost right now.

lets try to clear things up a bit.

the block is moving, hits into the beam.

I'm guessing the beam makes a full revolution and comes back down to the initial position?

then the block moves backwards with a velocity that was less than what it initially was. and since it was going backwards, the velocity is negative.

is everything correct so far?

No. You need to consider the situation just before and after collision. The block had some velocity initially, the rod was in rest.
The block has some angular momentum both before and after the collision. The beam has angular momentum after the collision. The angular momentum before collision is the same as the angular momentum after it.
Also, the initial KE of the block is the same as the KE of the block plus the rotational energy of the beam just after collision.
You do not know the direction of the final velocity of the block. Consider it positive. If it comes out to be negative at the end, it would mean that the block moves backward after the collision.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
it's a bit hard trying to grasp how an object moving linearly can have an angular momentum. anyways:

Kinetic energy :
1/2 m vi^2 = (1/2 m vf^2) +(1/2) (I) (ω^2)angular momentum:

m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( I ω)

I =1/12*M* D^2

=
m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( (1/12*M* D^2) ω)
 
  • #33
goonking said:
it's a bit hard trying to grasp how an object moving linearly can have an angular momentum. anyways:

Kinetic energy :
1/2 m vi^2 = (1/2 m vf^2) +(1/2) (I) (ω^2)angular momentum:

m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( I ω)

I =1/12*M* D^2

=
m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( (1/12*M* D^2) ω)

It is right now. Solve for vf.
 
  • #34
ehild said:
It is right now. Solve for vf.
is this just all algebra now?

how do we eliminate ω?

and D is unknown.
 
  • #35
ehild said:
It is right now. Solve for vf.
shouldn't the M in I =1/12*M* D^2 be 2m?

so
I =1/12*2m* D^2

?
 
  • #36
goonking said:
shouldn't the M in I =1/12*M* D^2 be 2m?

so
I =1/12*2m* D^2

?
D is unknown, solve in terms of it. And yes, the mass of the beam is M=2m
 
  • #37
goonking said:
shouldn't the M in I =1/12*M* D^2 be 2m?
ehild said:
D is unknown, solve in terms of it. And yes, the mass of the beam is M=2m
after doing some algebra in the angular momentum section. i get :

10 = (Vf /2) + ( D ω )

seems right so far?

D = (10- (Vf/2)) / ω
 
Last edited:
  • #38
No, I do not think it is right. And you need vf, not D.
 
  • #39
goonking said:
after doing some algebra in the angular momentum section. i get :

10 = (Vf * 1/2) + ( D ω )

seems right so far?
ehild said:
No, I do not think it is right. And you need vf, not D.
the D's must cancel out somewhere, I'm still trying to figure out where.
 
  • #40
goonking said:
the D's must cancel out somewhere, I'm still trying to figure out where.
Work symbolically. Keep D and isolate omega.
 
  • #41
ehild said:
Work symbolically. Keep D and isolate omega.
ω = (60 D - Vf D) / 2D^2

correct?
 
  • #42
goonking said:
ω = (60 D - Vf D) / 2D^2

correct?
if my algebra is correct, i can simplify more by canceling out the D's to get :

ω = (60 - Vf) / 2?
 
  • #43
It is certainly wrong, Check the dimensions.
 
  • #44
I will continue looking at this problem when i come back from school. hopefully I will see things I didn't see before lol
 
  • #45
goonking said:
Kinetic energy :
1/2 m vi^2 = (1/2 m vf^2) +(1/2) (I) (ω^2)angular momentum:

m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( I ω)

I =1/12*M* D^2

=
m vi D/2 = (m vf D/2) + ( (1/12*M* D^2) ω)

These are the correct equations, and M=2m.

From the first equation, you got
ω = (60 D - Vf D) / 2D^2
which is almost correct, but you have an algebraic error.

Substituting ##I=\frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 ## into the angular momentum equation (m vi D/2 )= (m vf D/2) + ( I ω), you get

##m v_i \frac{D}{2}= m v_f \frac{D}{2}+ \frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 \omega ## .

Simplifying, it results in ## v_i - v_f = \frac{1}{3} D \omega ## . I think you made the error when multiplying by the constants.

So you get Dω in terms of the velocities. Working with the energy equation, (Dω )2 appears. Substitute .
 
  • #46
ehild said:
These are the correct eq uations, and M=2m.

From the first equation, you got

which is almost correct, but you have an algebraic error.

Substituting ##I=\frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 ## into the angular momentum equation (m vi D/2 )= (m vf D/2) + ( I ω), you get

##m v_i \frac{D}{2}= m v_f \frac{D}{2}+ \frac{1}{12} (2m) D^2 \omega ## .

Simplifying, it results in ## v_i - v_f = \frac{1}{3} D \omega ## . I think you made the error when multiplying by the constants.

So you get Dω in terms of the velocities. Working with the energy equation, (Dω )2 appears. Substitute .
yes, the algebra was very long.

anyways, i got 1/2 m vo 2 = 1/2 m vf2 + 1/2 ((m d2) / 6 ) (3/d (vo - vf))2

1/2's and m's cancel out from each side.

vo2 = vf2 + (d2/6) ((9/d2 (vo - vf)2)

d's cancel out

vo2 = vf2 + (3/2) (vo- vf)2

now do should i foil the (vo- vf)2?
 
Last edited:
  • #47
goonking said:
vo2 = vf2 + (3/2) (vo- vf)2

now do should i foil the (vo- vf)2?

You can substitute the numerical value of vo now. Expand the square and solve the quadratic equation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
871
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K