Kernels & Images: Matrix A vs. Matrix B

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tonyt88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Images
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the kernels and images of matrices A and B, where B is the reduced row-echelon form (rref) of A. It is established that ker(A) is equal to ker(B) because the kernel is derived from the augmented matrix, which remains unchanged in rref. However, im(A) is not necessarily equal to im(B) due to potential changes in the span of the column vectors after transformation to rref.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts such as kernels and images.
  • Familiarity with matrix transformations, specifically reduced row-echelon form (rref).
  • Knowledge of augmented matrices and their role in solving linear systems.
  • Basic proficiency in matrix notation and operations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of kernel and image in linear transformations.
  • Learn about the implications of matrix rank on the image of a matrix.
  • Explore the process of converting matrices to reduced row-echelon form (rref) using Gaussian elimination.
  • Investigate the relationship between the null space and column space of matrices.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians focusing on matrix theory, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of matrix transformations and their implications in linear systems.

Tonyt88
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a matrix A, and let B = rref(A)
(a) Is ker(A) necessarily equal to ker(B)? Explain.
(b) Is im(A) necessarily equal to im(B)? Explain.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I feel confident saying yes for (a) and no for (b), and what I can articulate is that (a) is true because the kernel is the augmented matrix with the last column with all zeros, thus, it is irrelevant whether or not the matrix is in rref. But I don't know how to express (b).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does rref mean?
 
It's reduced row-echelon form, but nevermind, I got the answer, though thanks for the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K