Ket Notation - Effects of the Projection Operator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of the projection operator in ket notation, specifically in the context of quantum mechanics as presented in Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics. The original poster is attempting to derive a specific equation related to inner products involving bras and kets.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions whether the summation of inner products can be simplified and expresses uncertainty about the implications of the projection operator. Some participants suggest checking a fundamental property of inner products, while others explore the implications of considering eigenkets of a Hermitian operator.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts, questioning assumptions about the nature of the inner products and the properties of operators involved. There is an exploration of whether certain equalities hold true under specific conditions, particularly regarding Hermitian operators and their eigenkets.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the nature of the inner products and whether certain assumptions about their reality can be made. The original poster's inquiry is framed within the constraints of deriving a specific equation from a textbook, which may limit the information available for discussion.

Questioneer
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Ket Notation -- Effects of the Projection Operator

Homework Statement


From Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics (Revised Edition), it is just deriving equation 1.3.12.


Homework Equations


\begin{eqnarray*}\langle \alpha |\cdot (\sum_{a'}^N |a'\rangle \langle a'|) \cdot|\alpha \rangle \end{eqnarray*}

The Attempt at a Solution


The summation can be moved to the left, so everything is being summed from a' to N, but does an alpha bra inner product with a' (or <α|a'>) does the sum of this from all a' to N equal Ʃ<a'|α>? maybe this is simple and I just can't see it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Check (1.2.12), which is a fundamental property of the inner product. That property holds even when the bras and kets correspond to different bases.
 


fzero said:
Check (1.2.12), which is a fundamental property of the inner product. That property holds even when the bras and kets correspond to different bases.

So, is it in this particular case that they are equal because we are considering the eigenkets of A, a hermitian operator? Because these are the eigenkets of A, does that mean that all operators on it are real? Even though it is the operator <α| acting on it and not A?
 


Questioneer said:
So, is it in this particular case that they are equal because we are considering the eigenkets of A, a hermitian operator? Because these are the eigenkets of A, does that mean that all operators on it are real? Even though it is the operator <α| acting on it and not A?

There's no assumption here that \langle \alpha | a&#039;\rangle is real, just that \langle \alpha | a&#039;\rangle = \langle a&#039;| \alpha\rangle^*. That is why the absolute value appears in the formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K