Key Argument for Global Warming Critics Evaporates

[Andre]

It is relevant *only* because through that training I was forced to learn to read scientific literature for comprehension.

Sorry I was fooling around on a quotation page:

Try not to have a good time... this is supposed to be educational.
Charles M. Schulz

But reading well over 500 scientific papers and abstracts about the ice age, it was still a good time seeing ones hypotheses getting more and support.

In fact, we probably agree on far more, than what we disagree on.

Yes

Thank you for not telling me my previous post was nothing but a fallacy.

I do regret that I felt forced to mention fallacies sometimes and I'm sorry about that. I'm afraid it's a part of the unexplaining proces of global warming.

I had made a 3 pages worth of reply one a lonely net-less PC but the file crashed after transporting. I'll post it tomorrow as a new thread.

 

[Mk]

I had made a 3 pages worth of reply one a lonely net-less PC but the file crashed after transporting. I'll post it tomorrow as a new thread.

OMG I HATE it when that happens! I'm always like WHAT TEH F***? @#$$*&! Happens inmmeasureable amounts of times to me when writing many page emails, General Physics replies, blog and journal posts... I close the window, the tab, quit the program, or accidently restart the computer!

So now, anytime I am writing something more than a few paragraphs, I always save it as a .rtf or .txt file on my computer, as "PF Post," or "Wikipedia," or something like that. Yay!

 

[Andre]

Relax Mk. I had a safety copy but on another location. Putting it up in a moment.

 

[Mk]

Sorry if I was too erratic and "fast and furious" in that last post.