Kicking a Ball: Solving for Height, Time, & Distance

  • Thread starter Thread starter maiamorbific
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Height Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a girl kicking a ball straight up with an initial velocity of 3 m/s from a height of 1 m. The calculations for the maximum height reached by the ball and the time until it hits the ground are debated, with adjustments made for the initial height and gravity's effect. The participants clarify that the time of ascent equals the time of descent for the entire flight, leading to a total time of 1.174 seconds. For the horizontal distance traveled, a simpler approach is suggested, with calculations yielding a distance of 3.348 m. Lastly, the final velocity upon hitting the ground must consider both the vertical and horizontal components, emphasizing the need for comprehensive analysis in projectile motion.
maiamorbific
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Girl kicks ball straight up, makes contact with ball 1 m above ground, initial velocity = 3 m/s
a.) How high does the ball go?
b.) How long until it hits the ground?
c.) If she had given it an initial x-component of velocity of 2 m/s (same y-component), how far would the ball land from her?
d.) With what velocity would it hit the ground?

Homework Equations


vf2 = vi2 + 2ay(yf-yi)
vf = vi + at
xf = xi + vit + 1/2axt2

The Attempt at a Solution


a.) vf2 = vi2 + 2ay(yf-yi)
0 = 32 + 2(9.8)(yf - 1)
-9 = 19.6yf - 19.6
10.6/19.6 = yf
yf = 0.5408 m
This seems like a really small number; shouldn't it be higher?

b.) vf = vi + at
0 = vi + -gt
t = vi/g
t = 3/9.8 = 0.306 s
0.306 s * 2 = 0.612 s (because the flight curve is symmetric)

I'm not really sure what equations to use for parts c and d, neither am I sure if parts a and b are correct.
Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) check your convention is gravity positive or negative?

b) you need to think about where she initially kicked it from and whether time up == time down for entire trip or just for the symmetric part.

c) What do you need to know about the ball to determine how far it traveled given no air resistance?
hint: it's none of those equations, it's simpler than that.
 
Thank you for your help so far.

a.) Changing a to -9.8 gives a final y-position of 2.837 m.
b.) Using the eqn. yf = yi + vit + 1/2at2 makes more sense because it takes into account the non-zero starting position of 1 m.
Therefore, t = 1.174 s
question:
Do I have to multiply this answer by 2? (I don't think so, because doesn't the quadratic equation represent the entire parabola of the flight curve?)

question:
c.) I don't know what you mean by not having to use any eqn.
I used xf = xi + vit + 1/2at2
xf = 1 + 2(1.174) + 0 (since no a in x-direction)
xf = 3.348 m
Is this not correct?

question:
d.) Would vf = vi because there no acceleration in x-direction?
Would the answer be 2 m/s?
 
for c I was thinking of even more simply: d = v*t, which is just a simplified version of the one you used.

d) you still need to take y velocity into account here...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top