Killing tensor notation quick questions

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the notation and terminology surrounding the quantity K² = K_{uv}V^{u}V^{v}, which is constant along geodesics when K is a Killing vector. The user questions why this quantity is referred to as K² rather than another designation, and whether a different notation, such as L, would be more appropriate. There is also a concern about the implications of calling it K², particularly regarding assumptions of positivity. The conversation seeks clarification on these points and guidance towards further resources. Understanding the conventions in tensor notation is crucial for accurate communication in the context of differential geometry and general relativity.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
My notes read that, the quantity ##K^{2}=K_{uv}V^{u}V^{v}## is constant along geodesics, where ##K## is a killing vector. I know my definition that the quantity on the RHS is conserved, I'm just wondering why do we call it ##K^{2}##, rather than anything else?

In analogy to a killing vector, if ##K## was a killing vector, would we instead call this ##L## or whatver, but without a squared sign?

Thanks in advance for any guidance, or a point towards some notes on this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump. Also by calling it ##K^{2}## aren't we asumming its positive, how would we know this? thank you.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
737
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K