Kilojoules per kilo to watts per second

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ripcrow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Per Watts
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of kilojoules per kilogram to watts per second, specifically in the context of vaporizing water. A peltier module rated at 5 watts consumes 5 watts per second. To determine the power required to vaporize 0.0129 kg of water, which requires 2405 kJ per kilogram, the calculation yields 31 kW. The confusion arises from interpreting watts and kilowatts, where 31 kW equals 31,000 watts, indicating a significant power requirement for the process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as energy, power, and heat transfer.
  • Familiarity with the units of measurement: joules, kilojoules, watts, and kilowatts.
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis for unit conversions.
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics related to phase changes of water.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Dimensional Analysis" for effective unit conversion techniques.
  • Learn about "Thermodynamics of Phase Changes" to understand energy requirements for vaporization.
  • Explore "Power Calculations in Electrical Engineering" to deepen knowledge of watts and kilowatts.
  • Investigate "Heat Transfer in Peltier Devices" for practical applications of thermoelectric cooling.
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and students in STEM fields who are involved in energy calculations, thermodynamics, or electrical engineering will benefit from this discussion.

Ripcrow
Messages
82
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
I have a system that requires 2405 kilojoules to vaporise 1 kilogram of water. I have a mass flow rate of 0.0129 kg per second. How many watts are required per second to sustain the required vaporisation rate.
My understanding is that electrical devices are rated in watts which is really watts per second. For instance if a peltier module is rated at 5 watts it will use 5 watts per second. I had thought that it should be simple to convert kilojoules to watts but everywhere I’ve looked i can only find kilojoules to watt hour conversion yet I can find calculations to convert joules to watts in turbines ( power output ). Is it as simple as converting kilojoules to watt hours and then dividing by 3600 to get back to watts required per second.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A Watt is a joule per second. Watts is power, Joules is energy. There's no such thing as "watts per second". You just want Watts.
 
1 kg of water will require 2405 kJ.
At a flow rate of 0.0129 kg per second, 1 kg will take 1 / 0.0129 = 77.5 sec.
That is 2405 kJ / 77.5 sec = 31.0 kJ/sec = 31.0 kW.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ripcrow
russ_watters said:
A Watt is a joule per second. Watts is power, Joules is energy. There's no such thing as "watts per second". You just want Watts.

yes. How many watts do I need to vaporise 0.0129 kg of water per second given I need 2405 kJ per kilo.
 
Ripcrow said:
yes. How many watts do I need to vaporise 0.0129 kg of water per second given I need 2405 kJ per kilo.
You know kg per second and kJ per kilo, so how many kJ do you need per second?
 
got it thanks. For some reason I kept getting 31 kw. Must have been interpreting the answer wrong.
 
russ_watters said:
You know kg per second and kJ per kilo, so how many kJ do you need per second?

thanks. The answer above here confirmed my maths. I was interpreting the answer as kw and not as watts.
 
Ripcrow said:
got it thanks. For some reason I kept getting 31 kw. Must have been interpreting the answer wrong.
Ripcrow said:
thanks. The answer above here confirmed my maths. I was interpreting the answer as kw and not as watts.
Just to be clear; a kW is 1000 watts. 31 kW is a correct answer. If you just want plain watts, you multiply by 1000: 31,000 W.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ripcrow
So is it 31 watts or 31 kw
 
  • #10
31 thousand watts = 31 kW.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Ripcrow
  • #11
That’s a tremendous amount of power
 
  • #12
Ripcrow said:
That’s a tremendous amount of power
It is not trivial.
At 20 cents per kW⋅hr it will cost you about $6.20 per hour to run the plant.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ripcrow
  • #13
And energy out is only 1690 joules using 1/2 mass times velocity squared where mass is 0.0129 divided by 2 = 0.00645 kg multiplied by 512 metres per second squared = 1690 joules. Or it it kilojoules.
 
  • #15
DaveE said:
I think you will find these videos about working with dimensional units really helpful in your
future problems. This "dimensional analysis" is a great tool to make all STEM work easier.
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/al...on/v/dimensional-analysis-units-algebraically
I had the right answer as 31 kw but I didn’t believe it. Seems excessive. Just needed to clarify it. 31 watts made this very possible but 31 kilowatts destroys it.
 
  • #16
Ripcrow said:
And energy out is only 1690 joules using 1/2 mass times velocity squared where mass is 0.0129 divided by 2 = 0.00645 kg multiplied by 512 metres per second squared = 1690 joules. Or it it kilojoules.
0.5 * 0.0129 kg * (512 m/sec)2 = 1690.8 joule = 1.6908 kJ
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ripcrow
  • #17
Baluncore said:
0.5 * 0.0129 kg * (512 m/sec)2 = 1690.8 joule = 1.6908 kJ
Sad output for the amount of energy going in. That equals 1690 nm. About 2 hp out for about 25 hp input
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
22K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K