Kinematic Equations: Can They be Used with 0 Acceleration?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of kinematic equations in scenarios where acceleration is zero. Participants explore whether zero acceleration can be treated as a constant and how this affects the interpretation of the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the validity of using kinematic equations when acceleration is zero, discussing specific equations and their implications. Some express uncertainty about the meaning of applying these equations under such conditions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts and reasoning. Some guidance has been offered to encourage independent thinking, while others seek more direct feedback on their interpretations. There is a mix of interpretations being explored regarding the implications of zero acceleration.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the constraints of understanding kinematic equations in the context of homework rules, with some expressing frustration over the lack of direct answers and the need for clarification on their reasoning.

~christina~
Gold Member
Messages
714
Reaction score
0
Can they be used if the acceleration is = to zero??

I know that they can only be used if the acceleration is constant but is zero considered a constant??


Thanks =):confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think? Try it and see what happens.
 
What do you mean try it?? I don't have a particular question...if I plug it into...

xf= xi + V*xi*t +(1/2)*ax*t^2 I get
if a=0

xf= xi +v*xi*t+ 0

Does this mean it is okay? I'm not sure what it would mean to say it "can be used".
 
Well, does the equation make sense when you made a=0?
 
:cry: I don't know...seriously..if it is okay or doesn't make sense...

is it yes?
reasoning: it is for the position as a function of time but even though you cancel out the t^2 with the zero there is still another t in the equation but this wouldn't make sense for the other kinematic equation:

vxf^2= vxi^2 +2ax(xf-xi)

since if you put in 0 for the ax then the only thing left is vxf^2= vxi^2
I'm not sure if that would make sense...but if it had 0 acceleration the object could still be moving so I dont' think the initial position would be the same as the final in all cases.

Help...
 
I don't know...*you're* going to tell me if it makes sense or not.

You are on the right track. Think some more and then post. I want you to develop the skill of thinking for yourself. (That means no one else post an answer for her, PLEASE ).
 
that response doesn't help at all, it doesn't give me any clue as to if my thoughts are correct or incorrect...all you tell me is to think...I did that before and posted what I thought...can't you give me a hint or something?

P.S telling me to think more isn't helping me...
 
I think cyrus is hoping that one would realize if acceleration, a = 0, then the problem is one of constant velocity.

Acceleration is the change in velocity as a function of time.
 
Thank you...Astronuc
That helped a lot ..now I can keep it in mind that it does make sense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K