Kinematics and angular speed of a collision between a rod and puck

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of kinetic energy and angular speed during a collision between a rod and a puck. The initial total kinetic energy is calculated to be 19.2 J, while the final kinetic energy after the collision is 4.8 J. The linear speed of 2 m/s is incorrectly related to angular speed using the formula, leading to confusion. Angular speed is defined as the rate of rotation around an axis, which is crucial for understanding the dynamics of the collision. Clarifying the concept of angular speed is essential for accurately solving the problem.
ac7597
Messages
126
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
A rod of mass 1.8 kg and length 3.3 m lies motionless on the frictionless ice, pointing North-South. A glue-covered hockey puck of mass 0.6 kg slides towards the rod at a speed of 8 m/s heading East.
What is the total kinetic energy of these objects?

The puck collides with the rod at the very middle of the rod, and sticks there.

What is the final linear speed of the combined object after the collision?

What is the final angular speed of the combined object after the collision?

What is the total kinetic energy of these objects now, after the collision?
Relevant Equations
KE= (1/2) (mass)(velocity)^2
initial total KE= (1/2)(0.6kg)(8m/s)^2 = 19.2J
(0.6kg)(8m/s) = (0.6kg+1.8kg)(vf)
vf= 2m/s
final KE= (1/2)(0.6kg+1.8kg)(2m/s)^2 = 4.8J
I tried to use linear speed=angular speed * radius : thus
2m/s= angular speed * (3.3m/2)
angular speed= 1.2 rad/s
Apparently that is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you describe what angular speed is, rather than just a formula. That should be a big hint, if you think about the problem description.
 
0 rad/s
 
ac7597 said:
0 rad/s
Yes.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
1K