Kinematics and angular speed of a collision between a rod and puck

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving the collision between a rod and a puck, focusing on the calculation of angular speed and kinetic energy before and after the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the final velocity and angular speed after a collision, using kinetic energy and linear speed formulas. Some participants question the understanding of angular speed and suggest a deeper exploration of its definition rather than relying solely on formulas.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of angular speed. There is an indication that some guidance has been offered regarding the conceptual understanding of angular speed, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and implications of angular speed in the context of the problem, which may involve assumptions about the system's setup and the nature of the collision.

ac7597
Messages
126
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
A rod of mass 1.8 kg and length 3.3 m lies motionless on the frictionless ice, pointing North-South. A glue-covered hockey puck of mass 0.6 kg slides towards the rod at a speed of 8 m/s heading East.
What is the total kinetic energy of these objects?

The puck collides with the rod at the very middle of the rod, and sticks there.

What is the final linear speed of the combined object after the collision?

What is the final angular speed of the combined object after the collision?

What is the total kinetic energy of these objects now, after the collision?
Relevant Equations
KE= (1/2) (mass)(velocity)^2
initial total KE= (1/2)(0.6kg)(8m/s)^2 = 19.2J
(0.6kg)(8m/s) = (0.6kg+1.8kg)(vf)
vf= 2m/s
final KE= (1/2)(0.6kg+1.8kg)(2m/s)^2 = 4.8J
I tried to use linear speed=angular speed * radius : thus
2m/s= angular speed * (3.3m/2)
angular speed= 1.2 rad/s
Apparently that is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you describe what angular speed is, rather than just a formula. That should be a big hint, if you think about the problem description.
 
0 rad/s
 
ac7597 said:
0 rad/s
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K