Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Kinematics Car Distance Problem

  1. Jan 31, 2006 #1
    I have a problem that I just cant get a handle on.
    You have a car that drives from A to B in 1620 seconds and then B to C.
    The total distance from A to C is 10,000 meters (A to C is a straight line)
    The acceleration of the car from B to C is .2 m/s^2
    I need to know how long the car takes to go from B to C IF it it travel from
    A to C in a total time of LESS than 1800 seconds (30 minutes)
    the distance from A to B is 8900 meters and B to C is 1100 meteres

    Thank you

  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 1, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    IF it it travels from
    This is like saying the car drives from A to C doing at least 20 km/hr

    So your question becomes:
    How long does it take a car to travel 1100 meters given that its initial velocity is at least 20 km/hr and it is accelerating at 0.2 m/s^2?

    I'd still need to know what initial velocity is. Without that, I could only give you a range of answers, using 20 and infinity as velocity to compute the answer.

    Maybe your answer is supposed to be in the form:
    "The car will take no longer than ____ to travel from B to C."
    Last edited: Feb 1, 2006
  4. Feb 3, 2006 #3
    well, I might be wrong but i would say it would take about 50.74 seconds. First, i found the velocity of the car from a to b (v=d/t), knowing that i had the initial velocity to start thinking about the problem from point b to c. Then i use the formula vf^2=vi^2+2ad for and I plugged in for vi= 5.49 m/s a=.2m/s^2 (given) d= 1100m (from point b to c) then i would have the final velocity with that i used v=d/t and changed it to t=d/v and i got 50.74 seconds. I might be wrong and if you find the right answer let me know
  5. Feb 3, 2006 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I think you got it wrong. Disregard my original post. I fell for the irrelevant data trick.

    Once you find your final velocity, compute your average velocity (B to C) and use that in your t=d/v formula.

    Or use the formula xf=xi+vit+0.5at^2 and use the quadratic equation. I get the same answer both ways.
  6. Feb 4, 2006 #5
    It is ok (in a way) if I got it wrong. It is all about knowing how to do it. However, what irrelevant data are you talking about?..... I got vf=21.68, i know that you said that after you plugged the final velocity into both of the formulas you got the same answer, however, i did not, so yes, i see that i could have made a mistake. It would be helpful if you would tell me perhaps how you achieved your answer and ofcourse state all of the calculations you made, that way i could compare, understand, and learn how to do the problem. Thank you.
  7. Feb 4, 2006 #6


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    What answers did you get?

    The irrelevant data is this: "it travel from A to C in a total time of LESS than 1800 seconds".

    I didn't use 1800 for anything.

    No, I didn't plug the final velocity into either formula. The 1st formula (t=d/v) wants average velocity for v, and the 2nd formula wants initial velocity.
    Average velocity = (final velocity + initial velocity) / 2

    Did you try the quadratic way?
  8. Feb 4, 2006 #7
    Everytime i use a different formula i get a different answer which has confused me in a way, quadratic way? if by that you mean "xf=xi+vit+0.5at^2" what is x? distance? if it is then i have never seen such equation before and it gives me a negative distance which i cannot take the sq root of since it would be a non real answer. For such reason, i dont believe that x would stand for distance. After using some other formulas i have gotten 81 seconds using avg velocity. I do not understand why you did not use avg velocity.
  9. Feb 4, 2006 #8


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I got 81 too.

    I can't seem to get TEX to work in preview mode, so this will be ugle

    The quadratic way: (this way is harder, but it's good to know how)



    set it equal to 0




    Since it's + or - sqrt, you need to do it twice and discard the unreasonable answer:


    t=80.96 (accept this answer since it agrees with your other answer and it seems reasonable)


    t=-135.9 (disragerd this answer since your time can't be negative)
  10. Feb 4, 2006 #9
    Thank you very much, tony873004, for i have learned some things thanks to you. Things that i had not learned or perhaps that i had not paid enough attention to, which i regret.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook