Kinematics - Constant acceleration and friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a kinematics problem involving a car decelerating on a flat highway due to friction. The original poster presents the scenario where the car's initial speed, coefficient of kinetic friction, and gravitational acceleration are known, but expresses concern about having too many unknowns to find the stopping distance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between average speed, distance, and time, questioning how to derive time without knowing acceleration. Some suggest using Newton's equations of motion to find deceleration based on friction, while others note the importance of mass in the context of the coefficient of friction.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen various interpretations of the problem, with participants offering different perspectives on how to approach the unknowns. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of equations of motion, but there remains a lack of consensus on the necessity of mass in solving the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the mass of the car is not provided, which raises questions about the relevance of the coefficient of friction in the calculations. The original poster initially feels the problem may be unsolvable due to the missing variables.

Kaoi
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Unsolvable? Kinematics - Constant deceleration and friction

Here's the way the problem is laid out:

A car travels at 52.4 km/hr on a flat highway. If the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.151, what is the minimum distance needed for the car to stop?

Given:
Vi = 52.4 km/hr (calculated as 14.555(...) m/s)
Vf = 0 m/s
muk= 0.151
g = 9.81 m/s2

Unknown:
/\ x, /\ t, a, m

It seems to me that I have too many missing variables to solve the problem.

I know that Vavg = (Vi + Vf)/2, so the average velocity would be around 7. 277 m/s, but without /\t, I can't carry out any of the normal kinematic equations to find /\x, and without m, I can't figure out Fk, Fg, or FN.

Is there something I'm missing, or is the problem actually unsolvable?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you think you can find t? You know the average speed the car will have over the distance. If you have the average rate of change of distance with respect to time, and you know the total distance then you can determine time.
 
But that's just the problem-- I'm trying to find the distance (/\x), and to do that, I would need a, which requires /\t, none of which I have...
 
Kaoi said:
Here's the way the problem is laid out:

A car travels at 52.4 km/hr on a flat highway. If the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.151, what is the minimum distance needed for the car to stop?

Given:
Vi = 52.4 km/hr (calculated as 14.555(...) m/s)
Vf = 0 m/s
muk= 0.151
g = 9.81 m/s2

Unknown:
/\ x, /\ t, a, m

It seems to me that I have too many missing variables to solve the problem.

I know that Vavg = (Vi + Vf)/2, so the average velocity would be around 7. 277 m/s, but without /\t, I can't carry out any of the normal kinematic equations to find /\x, and without m, I can't figure out Fk, Fg, or FN.

Is there something I'm missing, or is the problem actually unsolvable?

You can calculate the decceleration of the car from Newton's equation of motion, where the decceleration must be proportional to the resultant force acting on the car, which is the force of friction. Generally, this force equals F = k N, where k is the coefficient of friction (dynamic friction, in your case), and N is the reaction from the ground acting on the car, which equals the weight of the car. Now, since you know the decceleration, you can use the equation [tex]v_{final}=v_{0}-at[/tex] to calculate the time of decceleration from 52.4 km/hr to 0 km/hr. In the end, you can use the equation for displacement of the car, [tex]x(t)=v_{0}t-\frac{1}{2}at^2[/tex], to find the distance which the car passes until it stops.
 
If you don't know the mass of the car, the "coefficient of friction" is irrelevant.
 
HallsofIvy said:
If you don't know the mass of the car, the "coefficient of friction" is irrelevant.

Absolutely right, I oversaw that the mass is not given.
 
Solved!

After asking my teacher, I solved the problem-- I was assuming that there was a force in the opposite direction of friction.

Basically, the acceleration was

-(mu(k)Fn)/m, which equals

-(mu(k)mg)/m, canceling to

a = -(mu(k)g).

Then I could use the vf2 = vi2 + 2a/\x equation to solve for distance.

Thank you all for your help anyway!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K