Kinematics Equations and a Cliff

AI Thread Summary
A car drives off a 100m cliff and must land 90m into a body of water, 30m away horizontally. The discussion focuses on using kinematics equations to determine the required horizontal velocity for the car to achieve this. Key points include the independence of vertical and horizontal motions, with the vertical motion being free fall and the horizontal motion having constant velocity. The correct approach involves calculating the time to fall using Δy = 1/2gt² and then applying that time to find the horizontal distance using Δx = v₀t. The final calculated horizontal velocity needed is debated, with one participant suggesting a value of 23.9 m/s as the correct answer.
MarchON
Messages
16
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A car drives off a cliff that is 100m high. It has to land in water and the water starts 30m away from the cliff. Its goal is to land 90m into the water. How fast must the car be going to land at that point in the water. Air resistance is negligible.

v=0
v0=?
a= -9.91m/s2
Δy=100m
Δx=120m

Homework Equations



My plan was to use kinematics and determine the time it takes for the car to fall using Δy= vt - 1/2(a)t2, then put that into Δx= 1/2(v+v0)t. Isn't it true that whether you throw something horizontally or just drop it, it takes the same time to hit the ground? Why does that not apply here regarding the horizontal distance and velocity?

The Attempt at a Solution



[/B]
My answer is wrong. I get 53 m/s (this seems like a lot anyway).


 
Physics news on Phys.org
MarchON said:
My plan was to use kinematics and determine the time it takes for the car to fall using Δy= vt - 1/2(a)t2, then put that into Δx= 1/2(v+v0)t.
Think over the last part of your strategy, keeping in mind a condition from the initial problem statement.
MarchON said:
Air resistance is negligible.
 
The strategy is certainly correct. I get a much smaller answer, though.
I find your horizontal motion distance formula confusing with the two velocities and division by 2.
The horizontal velocity is constant; why not just call it v? Try running it through that way!
 
MarchON said:

Homework Statement



A car drives off a cliff that is 100m high. It has to land in water and the water starts 30m away from the cliff. Its goal is to land 90m into the water. How fast must the car be going to land at that point in the water. Air resistance is negligible.

v=0
v0=?
a= -9.91m/s2
Δy=100m
Δx=120m

a=-9.81 m/s2
That means you took upward positive. Will the car move upward when falling from the cliff? What is the sign of Δy?

MarchON said:

Homework Equations



My plan was to use kinematics and determine the time it takes for the car to fall using Δy= vt - 1/2(a)t2, then put that into Δx= 1/2(v+v0)t. Isn't it true that whether you throw something horizontally or just drop it, it takes the same time to hit the ground? Why does that not apply here regarding the horizontal distance and velocity?

Δy= vt - 1/2(a)t2 is true if v means the vertical component of the initial velocity. But the car drives on a horizontal cliff. What is the vertical component of velocity at the instant when it leaves the cliff??
Δx= 1/2(v+v0)t is valid for uniform accelerating motion in the x direction, (horizontally). Is there any horizontal force applied on the car, causing acceleration in the horizontal direction, and changing the horizontal component of velocity?And you can not use the same notation v for the initial vertical velocity and the final horizontal velocity components.

It is true that whether you throw something horizontally or just drop it, it takes the same time to hit the ground.
 
First of all whether you throw something horizontally or dropping it does take the same time. However this does not mean it goes the same horizontal distance, the x-component of the velocity determines that. Also there is no velocity in the y-direction as the car is moving horizontally. What you are going to have to do is find the time it takes the car to hit the ground using
y = y0-1/2*g*t^2, Where g = 9.8 m/s^2 and y0 is the initial height.
Then use ∆x = v0t. Use the time (t) you solved for in the y equation and plug it into this x equation to solve for v0.
 
Last edited:
Bystander said:
Think over the last part of your strategy, keeping in mind a condition from the initial problem statement.

Air resistance being negligible is part of the problem and becomes in incorrect assumption for part C. It's there to show us that the final answer, whatever it is, will be inaccurate... I am having trouble getting to that final answer.
 
I don't see any parts in the question posted. What is part C?
 
@velo city: The policy of the forum does not allow to solve the problem for the OP. And it is even worse to show wrong solution, as yours is for the time for the fall. Also your formula for the ∆x is misleading as the OP used the notation a for -9.81.
 
ehild said:
Δy= vt - 1/2(a)t2 is true if v means the vertical component of the initial velocity. But the car drives on a horizontal cliff. What is the vertical component of velocity at the instant when it leaves the cliff??
Δx= 1/2(v+v0)t is valid for uniform accelerating motion in the x direction, (horizontally). Is there any horizontal force applied on the car, causing acceleration in the horizontal direction, and changing the horizontal component of velocity?And you can not use the same notation v for the initial vertical velocity and the final horizontal velocity components.

I thought that v was v final which is 0 with regards to the vertical portion of its fall? I thought v0 was the initial velocity which is what I am trying to find.
 
  • #10
Delphi51 said:
I don't see any parts in the question posted. What is part C?

I did not post that part because I understood it.
I was just letting you know, so people don't try to factor in air resistance mathematically.
 
  • #11
ehild said:
@velo city: The policy of the forum does not allow to solve the problem for the OP. And it is even worse to show wrong solution, as yours is for the time for the fall. Also your formula for the ∆x is misleading as the OP used the notation a for -9.81.
sorry i will change it.
 
  • #12
The v and vo are in the horizontal motion formula with no acceleration. We used to write d = vt in high school. This v is the speed of the car you are trying to find.
 
  • #13
MarchON said:
I thought that v was v final which is 0 with regards to the vertical portion of its fall? I thought v0 was the initial velocity which is what I am trying to find.
The vertical and horizontal motions of the car are independent if air resistance is ignored. The vertical motion is free fall. The displacement is Δy= vy0t - 1/2(g)t2
where vy0 is the initial vertical velocity. What is its value?
The velocity of the horizontal motion does not change during the fall. It is the unknown v.
 
  • #14
ehild said:
@velo city: The policy of the forum does not allow to solve the problem for the OP. And it is even worse to show wrong solution, as yours is for the time for the fall. Also your formula for the ∆x is misleading as the OP used the notation a for -9.81.
By the way I was using the time for the fall to find the x displacement. So my solution was not wrong.
 
  • #15
ehild said:
The vertical and horizontal motions of the car are independent if air resistance is ignored. The vertical motion is free fall. The displacement is Δy= vy0t - 1/2(g)t2
where vy0 is the initial vertical velocity. What is its value?
The velocity of the horizontal motion does not change during the fall. It is the unknown v.
I don't think the car has an initial vertical velocity right?
 
  • #16
ehild said:
where vy0 is the initial vertical velocity. What is its value?
0?

Anyway, I have the solution in front of me. It has a bunch of trig which I do not understand. The solution used the "standard coordinate system with the origin at the initial position of the car."

x = x0 + (v0,x)t+(1/2)(ax)t2 = 0 + v0(cosθ)t+(1/2)(0)t2=v0(cosθ)t
 
Last edited:
  • #17
MarchON said:
0?

Anyway, I have the solution in front of me. It has a bunch of trig which I do not understand. The solution used the "standard coordinate system with the origin at the initial position of the car."

x = x0 + (v0,x)t+(1/2)(ax)t2 = 0 + v0(cosθ)t+(1/2)(0)t2=v0(cosθ)t
the trig comes only from projectiles launched at an angle. In this case that angle (ø) is 0 because the car is only moving horizontally.
 
  • #18
velo city said:
the trig comes only from projectiles launched at an angle. In this case that angle (ø) is 0 because the car is only moving horizontally.
You should probably watch this video: . It will help you understand if you watch the whole thing. I don't want to give you a solution cause that is against the rules. So that video should help.

Also watch this one:
 
  • #19
velo city said:
By the way I was using the time for the fall to find the x displacement. So my solution was not wrong.
The time (more thn 20 s) was wrong. (You removed it already ). Also, the notation was misleading in the formula of x displacement. What value for a did you use? As the OP set a=-9.81 m/s2.
 
  • #20
I used a =0 as there is no acceleration in the x direction
 
  • #21
I also forgot to take the square root and divide when I solved for the time. Stupid me.
 
  • #22
velo city said:
I used a =0 as there is no acceleration in the x direction
That is correct.
One has to use different notations for different things, and also take attention of the notations used by the OP in the thread. ax instead of a here.
 
  • #23
velo city said:
I also forgot to take the square root and divide when I solved for the time. Stupid me.
Yes :) You see, it is much safer not to give out numerical solutions. o0)
 
  • #24
Ok, well my number has gotten smaller, but it is still not the 23.9 m/s that is apparently the answer.

I solved for time and got 4.5 seconds, and then using Δx=v0t+(1/2)(a)t2

I got 26.7 m/s
 
  • #25
What value did you use for a?
 
  • #26
0 because it's the x direction.

Right?
 
  • #27
ehild said:
What value did you use for a?
Right. Also the result v=26.7 m/s for the horizontal velocity was right.
 
  • #28
The answer my professor has given is 23.9 m/s. o_O
 
  • #29
MarchON said:
The answer my professor has given is 23.9 m/s. o_O
show him that he was wrong :)
 
  • #30
ehild said:
show him that he was wrong :)

Haha, not worth it. And I have no idea why he made the solution so overly confusing.
 
  • #31
MarchON said:
Haha, not worth it. And I have no idea why he made the solution so overly confusing.
Coward! A brave man should fight for the truth!
You can ask him to explain the "correct" solution to you as you got different result... And then he either founds his own error or we find his error or our error, if any.
If he made the solution confusing, he could have confused himself.
 
  • #32
I really like the two headings for horizontal and vertical parts of the motion in that example. That is a great first step in any two dimensional motion problem. The second step is to identify which part is accelerated motion and write the appropriate formulas.
 
Back
Top