toesockshoe said:
ugh, I am a moron too. btw, can you guys tell me what difficulty you would think this problem is? i would never have figured out the velocities equal each other if no one pointed it out... ugh. i feel like this is too hard a course for me.
I think you chose a complicated way to do it. If you begin at t = 0 when the train starts to move, you get:
##x_t = \frac{1}{2}at^2##
##x_p = v(t-6)##
This is much simpler than your equations.
With this approach, you are looking for v where you can solving the quadratic equation in t (by setting ##x_t = x_p##). And, to get the minimum v, you need the quadratic to have exactly one solution:
No solutions => v is too low and she never catches the train
Two solutions => v is too high and she catches up with the train, overtakes it, but it keeps speeding up and then catches her (so there are two times where the distances are equal)
One solution => v is just right and she just catches the train (just as the train reaches her speed)
There are, of course, other ways to solve the problem. Thinking about the equal velocities is a different solution. I wouldn't worry about that for now. I would concentrate on solving the quadratic equation implied above.
The key question is: when does a quadratic equation have exactly one solution?