MHB Kinematics, particle on half circle

Fantini
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
267
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem.

A point traversed half a circle of radius $R = 160 \text{ cm}$ during a time interval of $\tau = 10.0 \text{ s}$. Calculate the following quantities averaged over that time:

(a) the mean velocity $\langle v \rangle$;

(b) the modulus of the mean velocity $ |\langle {\mathbf v} \rangle|$;

(c) the modulus of the mean vector of the total acceleration $| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle |$ if the point moved with constant tangent acceleration.

I'm having trouble with (c). Since he mentioned there is a constant tangent acceleration I assumed it is non-zero (this may not be the case). I did not manage to reach a conclusion. Assuming it is zero, the mean acceleration is merely the mean normal acceleration. This leads to

$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle | = 2 | {\mathbf w}_n | = 2 \frac{\langle v \rangle^2}{R} = 2 \frac{\pi^2 R}{\tau^2}.$$

I'm missing something, because the alleged answer is

$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle | = \frac{2 \pi R}{\tau^2} \approx 10 \frac{\text{cm}}{\text{s}^2}.$$

Thank you. :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fantini said:
Here's the problem.

A point traversed half a circle of radius $R = 160 \text{ cm}$ during a time interval of $\tau = 10.0 \text{ s}$. Calculate the following quantities averaged over that time:

(a) the mean velocity $\langle v \rangle$;

(b) the modulus of the mean velocity $ |\langle {\mathbf v} \rangle|$;

(c) the modulus of the mean vector of the total acceleration $| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle |$ if the point moved with constant tangent acceleration.

I'm having trouble with (c). Since he mentioned there is a constant tangent acceleration I assumed it is non-zero (this may not be the case). I did not manage to reach a conclusion. Assuming it is zero, the mean acceleration is merely the mean normal acceleration. This leads to

$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle | = 2 | {\mathbf w}_n | = 2 \frac{\langle v \rangle^2}{R} = 2 \frac{\pi^2 R}{\tau^2}.$$

I'm missing something, because the alleged answer is

$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle | = \frac{2 \pi R}{\tau^2} \approx 10 \frac{\text{cm}}{\text{s}^2}.$$

Thank you. :)

Hey Fantini! ;)

Let $\alpha$ be the angular acceleration, which is constant.
Let $\omega_0$ be the initial angular velocity.
And let $0 \le \theta \le \pi$.

Then:
$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle |
= \left| \frac{\Delta \mathbf v}{\Delta t} \right|
= \left| \frac{\mathbf v(\pi) - \mathbf v(0)}{\tau} \right|
= \frac{|-R(\alpha\tau + \omega_0) + R\omega_0|}{\tau}
= R\alpha$$

Furthermore, we have:
$$\theta(\tau) = \frac 12 \alpha \tau^2 + \omega_0 \tau = \pi$$
$$\alpha = \frac{\pi - \omega_0\tau}{\frac 12 \tau^2}$$

So:
$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle |
= R\frac{\pi - \omega_0\tau}{\frac 12 \tau^2}
=\frac{2\pi R}{\tau^2} - \frac{2\omega_0 R}{\tau}$$

Apparently your problem assumes that $\omega_0=0$.
 
Hey ILS! :)

This is problem 1.19 from Irodov's Problems in General Physics, 1988. Is there any loss of generality by assuming $\omega_0 = 0$? It seems not, since the circular movement begins after $t=0$.

Thank you for your insightful input. ;)
 
Fantini said:
Hey ILS! :)

This is problem 1.19 from Irodov's Problems in General Physics, 1988. Is there any loss of generality by assuming $\omega_0 = 0$? It seems not, since the circular movement begins after $t=0$.

Thank you for your insightful input. ;)

You are right that we can assume $t=0$ without loss of generality.
However, since $|\langle \mathbf w \rangle|$ changes with $\omega_0$, it seems to me that there is loss of generality. So I don't understand where this assumption is coming from.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top