MHB Kinematics, particle on half circle

AI Thread Summary
A particle traverses half a circle of radius 160 cm in 10 seconds, prompting calculations for mean velocity and acceleration. The main confusion arises around the mean vector of total acceleration, particularly if constant tangent acceleration is assumed. It is suggested that if the initial angular velocity is zero, the mean acceleration simplifies to a formula involving only normal acceleration. However, the discussion reveals that assuming zero initial angular velocity may overlook variations in acceleration, indicating a potential loss of generality in the assumptions made.
Fantini
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
267
Reaction score
0
Here's the problem.

A point traversed half a circle of radius $R = 160 \text{ cm}$ during a time interval of $\tau = 10.0 \text{ s}$. Calculate the following quantities averaged over that time:

(a) the mean velocity $\langle v \rangle$;

(b) the modulus of the mean velocity $ |\langle {\mathbf v} \rangle|$;

(c) the modulus of the mean vector of the total acceleration $| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle |$ if the point moved with constant tangent acceleration.

I'm having trouble with (c). Since he mentioned there is a constant tangent acceleration I assumed it is non-zero (this may not be the case). I did not manage to reach a conclusion. Assuming it is zero, the mean acceleration is merely the mean normal acceleration. This leads to

$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle | = 2 | {\mathbf w}_n | = 2 \frac{\langle v \rangle^2}{R} = 2 \frac{\pi^2 R}{\tau^2}.$$

I'm missing something, because the alleged answer is

$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle | = \frac{2 \pi R}{\tau^2} \approx 10 \frac{\text{cm}}{\text{s}^2}.$$

Thank you. :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fantini said:
Here's the problem.

A point traversed half a circle of radius $R = 160 \text{ cm}$ during a time interval of $\tau = 10.0 \text{ s}$. Calculate the following quantities averaged over that time:

(a) the mean velocity $\langle v \rangle$;

(b) the modulus of the mean velocity $ |\langle {\mathbf v} \rangle|$;

(c) the modulus of the mean vector of the total acceleration $| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle |$ if the point moved with constant tangent acceleration.

I'm having trouble with (c). Since he mentioned there is a constant tangent acceleration I assumed it is non-zero (this may not be the case). I did not manage to reach a conclusion. Assuming it is zero, the mean acceleration is merely the mean normal acceleration. This leads to

$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle | = 2 | {\mathbf w}_n | = 2 \frac{\langle v \rangle^2}{R} = 2 \frac{\pi^2 R}{\tau^2}.$$

I'm missing something, because the alleged answer is

$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle | = \frac{2 \pi R}{\tau^2} \approx 10 \frac{\text{cm}}{\text{s}^2}.$$

Thank you. :)

Hey Fantini! ;)

Let $\alpha$ be the angular acceleration, which is constant.
Let $\omega_0$ be the initial angular velocity.
And let $0 \le \theta \le \pi$.

Then:
$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle |
= \left| \frac{\Delta \mathbf v}{\Delta t} \right|
= \left| \frac{\mathbf v(\pi) - \mathbf v(0)}{\tau} \right|
= \frac{|-R(\alpha\tau + \omega_0) + R\omega_0|}{\tau}
= R\alpha$$

Furthermore, we have:
$$\theta(\tau) = \frac 12 \alpha \tau^2 + \omega_0 \tau = \pi$$
$$\alpha = \frac{\pi - \omega_0\tau}{\frac 12 \tau^2}$$

So:
$$| \langle {\mathbf w} \rangle |
= R\frac{\pi - \omega_0\tau}{\frac 12 \tau^2}
=\frac{2\pi R}{\tau^2} - \frac{2\omega_0 R}{\tau}$$

Apparently your problem assumes that $\omega_0=0$.
 
Hey ILS! :)

This is problem 1.19 from Irodov's Problems in General Physics, 1988. Is there any loss of generality by assuming $\omega_0 = 0$? It seems not, since the circular movement begins after $t=0$.

Thank you for your insightful input. ;)
 
Fantini said:
Hey ILS! :)

This is problem 1.19 from Irodov's Problems in General Physics, 1988. Is there any loss of generality by assuming $\omega_0 = 0$? It seems not, since the circular movement begins after $t=0$.

Thank you for your insightful input. ;)

You are right that we can assume $t=0$ without loss of generality.
However, since $|\langle \mathbf w \rangle|$ changes with $\omega_0$, it seems to me that there is loss of generality. So I don't understand where this assumption is coming from.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top