Kinetic Energy in Racing Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a kinetic energy problem involving a father and son, where the father has one-third the kinetic energy of the son and one-third the mass of the father. The father accelerates by 1.6 m/s, resulting in equal kinetic energies. The equations set up to solve for the father's initial velocity are incorrect, leading to an erroneous solution of 0.359 m/s. The correct approach involves understanding how the increase in velocity affects kinetic energy and possibly simplifying the problem by focusing solely on the father's initial velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy formulas, specifically KE = 1/2 mv²
  • Basic algebra skills for manipulating equations
  • Knowledge of quadratic equations and their solutions
  • Concept of mass and velocity relationships in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of kinetic energy equations in physics
  • Learn how to solve quadratic equations effectively
  • Study the relationship between mass, velocity, and kinetic energy
  • Explore practical examples of kinetic energy problems in racing scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of kinetic energy in motion.

cd80187
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
All right, here is the question

A father racing his son has 1/3 the kinetic energy of the son, who has 1/3 the mass of the father. The father speeds up by 1.6 m/s and then has the same kinetic energy as the son.

So to being with, I set up two equations equal to each other, since the only unknown is initial velocity. I set it up as

(2/3)(1/2)(3m)(1.6)squared = (1/2)(3m)(v initial +1.6) squared

So to sum this up, I used 3m to represent the fathers weight in reference to the kid. The KE of the first half is multiplied times 2/3 because the increase of 1.6 m/s equalized the KE of the father and the boy, therefore the 1.6 m/s accounted for the other 2/3 of the energy. And on the other side, the v initial plus 1.6 m/s represented the final velocity that equaled the sons KE. I then canceled out the 3m and the 1/2 and graphed the quadratic equation, but I am getting an answer of .359 m/s, and that is not right. How can i fix this, and am I even starting off correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The increase of 1.6m/s by the father triples his KE, which makes his KE equal to his son's KE. The equation you wrote does not quite express this. Besides, you may not need to involve the son at first. Can you get the father's Vi just from knowing that Vi + 1.6m/s triples his KE compared to just running at Vi? And then you can use masses and KEs to figure out the boy's Vi.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
934
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K