Kinetic Energy: It sounds simple but I have been having a very hard time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the height of a house from which a stone falls, given that the stone's kinetic energy increases by 293 J in the last second of its fall. The correct height is determined to be 20.06 meters. The initial approach misapplied the kinetic energy formula, but after clarification, the user correctly utilized the relationship between kinetic energy and motion under constant acceleration to arrive at the correct solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kinetic Energy and its formula: ΔEkin = ½mvf2 - ½mvi2
  • Basic knowledge of physics concepts such as acceleration due to gravity (g) and free fall
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving time and velocity
  • Familiarity with the concept of motion under constant force
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the Kinetic Energy formula in various contexts
  • Learn about the equations of motion under constant acceleration, specifically for free-fall scenarios
  • Explore the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy in gravitational fields
  • Investigate common mistakes in applying physics formulas and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of motion and energy in gravitational contexts.

fara0815
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hello there !
I have been trying to figure the following problem out but unfortunately I have not had any obvious success. It is about Kinetic Energy:

A stone is falling from the roof of a house down to the ground. In the last second of the fall, the stone's energy increases of 293 J.
How high is the house?
(friction is neglected)


I have gone several ways but never got the stated result of 20,06 m.
I would be very happy if anyone could give me a hint to solve this one. It seems so easy but I cannot make it :(

The most logical way - at least for me - would be: (the ground is zero in my coordinate system)

∆Ekin= 293 J = 1/2 * m * v^2 thus: V= - 17,13 m/s

V is the velocity on average in the last second. Thus the calculated velocity is actually there at tf-0,5s. With Tf is meant the over all time of the fall.

V= - g*t, thus t= 1.745 s
tf= t + 0.5 s = 2,245 s

h= 1/2*g*t^2= 24,72 m

Any suggestions ?
I would be really happy to get some help with this one !
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi fara0815,

Your problem seems to be a misuse of the formula \Delta E_{kin} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2_f - \frac{1}{2}mv_i^2. This is not equal to \frac{1}{2} m v^2 where v = \frac{v_f - v_i}{2} is the average velocity. As it stands now, you have two unknowns v_i and v_f and only one equation relating them (the change in kinetic energy equation). You need to find some other way to relate the velocities, but this is simple to do since you're looking at motion under a constant force.
 
Wow ! Physics Monkey, thank you very much!

I took this way:

<br /> \Delta E_{kin} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2_f - \frac{1}{2}mv_i^2

= \frac{1}{2}ma^2 t^2_f - frac{1}{2}ma^2 (t_f - 1s)^2
= ma^2 t_f - \frac{1}{2}ma^2

Thus t_f = 2,022 s and with that is h= 20,06 m !


I just found this forum and I will definitely take a look around if I can help someone here! The Internet is such a great thing !

<br /> \Delta E_{kin} = \frac{1}{2}mv^2_f - \frac{1}{2}mv_i^2
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K