Kinetic Energy of rod with lower end in contact with smooth surface

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the kinetic energy of a rigid rod of length 2a, which is held at an angle α above a smooth horizontal surface, with one end in contact with the ground. Participants are exploring the implications of the rod's motion and the appropriate equations to describe its kinetic energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the components of kinetic energy, considering both translational and rotational motion. There is uncertainty about whether the center of mass remains stationary and how to properly account for the rod's motion in the kinetic energy equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants suggest simplifying the problem by focusing on the angle of the rod, while others emphasize the need to incorporate both translational and rotational aspects. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of reasoning have been proposed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the rod is not attached to the ground, raising questions about the motion of its center of mass. There are also discussions about the constraints imposed by the geometry of the problem and the forces acting on the rod.

C. Darwin
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've got a rigid rod, length 2a, held at an angle \alpha above a smooth horizontal surface. Its end is in contact with the ground. My two generalized coordinates are x, the horizontal position of the center of the rod and \theta the angle between the rod and the vertical.

I'm trying to find the kinetic energy of the rod. I'm not sure if I'm doing it right.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


As of now, this is what I've done:
KE = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 + \frac{1}{2}I\dot{\theta}^2 = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 + \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{3}m(2a)^2)\dot{\theta}^2 = \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 + \frac{2}{3}ma^2\dot{\theta}^2

Something doesn't seem right though, because I think that \dot{x} should be zero. Carrying out the Lagrangian doesn't seem to show this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\alpha is the azimuthal angle? Is the rod held to a point in ground? If not, the speed of it's center of mass won't be zero.
Also, I don't think you've got the formula right. K.E can be broken into a translational and a rotational term when you take the rotation about the center of mass. In this case the rotation is about a point in the ground. Perhaps you could use x and z?
 
All motion takes place in the vertical plane. Alpha is just the angle the rod is at when it's initially released. The end of the rod is touching, but NOT attached, to the ground.


I specified the KE of the rod by the translational motion in the x direction and by the rotational motion about the point touching the ground (even though it is slipping backwards). I'm almost certain this is incorrect but I couldn't come up with much better.
 
Ok, so there's no force here along the horizontal. The 2 forces, gravity and normal are both along the vertical. Consequently we should not have any motion along the horizontal. So we can use just one gen coordinate - the angle. Then we can rate of change of the angle (\dot(\theta) ) . Then the speed of any infinitesimal portion at a distance r from the point of contact is just r \dot(\theta) . So you can integrate along the length and find the KE.
 
The point of the problem is to use x and \dot{x} with the lagrangian and prove that the CM stays in place
 
Oh. To know that you don't actually need to know the KE : the potential term is mgy and the constraint condition \dot z =0. None of which contains x, ergo \dot x = 0 .

I think the KE may be found this way: Let x, y be the co-ordinates of the CM. Then y= a\sin\theta ( This is using the condition that the end keeps touching the ground)Then the co-ordinates of any other point on the rod :
(X,Y) = ( x - r\cos\theta , a\sin\theta - r\cos\theta) . Now you can take derivative, square and integrate along r (from -a to a) to find the KE.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K