Kinetic energy with effective mass

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the formulation of the kinetic energy operator for electrons in a crystal using a finite element approach, particularly when the effective mass of the electrons is position-dependent. Participants explore various mathematical representations and approximations related to this operator.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a kinetic energy operator that incorporates a position-dependent effective mass, suggesting a form that includes derivatives of the wavefunction.
  • Another participant suggests expressing the operator as a sum of a second derivative and a first derivative of the wavefunction.
  • A different approach is presented that approximates the first derivative using values from multiple grid points, raising questions about the necessity of including a second neighboring point in the approximation.
  • Participants discuss various methods for approximating the first derivative, highlighting the differences in accuracy between different formulations, including the use of Taylor expansion for justification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to approximate the kinetic energy operator and the necessity of including certain terms in their formulations. No consensus is reached regarding the optimal method for handling the effective mass in the finite element approach.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the impact of large jumps in effective mass between grid points on the physical validity of the results. Additionally, the discussion includes various assumptions about the spacing of grid points and the implications for accuracy in the approximations used.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
I want to write the kinetic energy operator as a matrix within a finite element approach for electrons moving in a crystal with some effective mass that is a function of position.
Now usually we have:
K = -ħ2/2m d2/dx2
such that the second order derivative of a wavefunction maybe written as:
d2/dx2 = 2/(xi+1-xi-1)* (ψi+1i)/(xi+1-xi) - (ψii-1)/(xi-xi-1))
But for electrons moving in a crystal where the effective mass depends on the spatial coordinate, then the kinetic energy operator is:
K = -ħ2/2 d/dx(1/m*(x) d/dx)
How can I write this in a finite element approach? Do I just put 1/mi in front of ψi etc.? I tried that but it gives some funny results that do not seem physical. In the problem I am solving the effective mass makes a large jump from one grid point to the next, so maybe this could cause some problems?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write it as the sum of a second derivative and a first derivative of psi.
 
You could also try ##\frac{d}{dx}\frac{1}{m}\frac{d \psi}{dx}\approx \{\frac{1}{m_{i+1}}\frac{\psi_{i+2}-\psi_{i}}{x_{i+2}-x_i}-\frac{1}{m_{i-1}}\frac{\psi_i-\psi_{i-2}}{x_i-x_{i-2}}\}\frac{1}{x_{i+1}-x_{i-1}}##
 
okay but why is it necessary to have ψi+2 and not just ψi+1? It seems you want the effective mass point in the middle between the two wavefunction points, why is that? (I looked up an article that do the exact same as you, so I guess it is correct).
 
There are different ways to approximate the first derivative; e.g. you could use ##\psi'(x_i)\approx (\psi(x_{i+1})-\psi(x_i))/(x_{i+1}-x_i)##, but, it should be intuitively clear that a better approximation is ##\psi'(x_i)\approx (\psi(x_{i+1})-\psi(x_{i-1}))/(x_{i+1}-x_{i-1})##. A more formal way would be to use the Taylor expansion on the RHS and show that for the second definition, second order corrections are absent, but not for the first one (assuming that the x_i are equidistant). So you are approximating
##1/m(x_i)\psi'(x_i)## and use the central difference formula.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K