Kinetic friction in a two mass, one pulley problem

AI Thread Summary
In a physics problem involving two masses connected by a pulley, the discussion centers on the unexpected relationship between the hanging mass (m2) and the coefficient of kinetic friction experienced by the mass on the table (m1). The participant observes that as m2 increases, both the acceleration and the coefficient of kinetic friction also increase, which contradicts the expectation that the coefficient should remain constant regardless of m2's mass. Other contributors emphasize that the coefficient of friction is dependent on the surface and should not vary with the mass experiencing the friction. Suggestions include conducting additional tests with similar masses to explore the relationship further. The participant is encouraged to share data for better analysis of the observed phenomenon.
StonedPhysicist
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have solved the problem where one mass m1 is on a horizontal frictional table connected to a mass m2 which is hanging off the table by a string over a pulley (assuming pulley massless), assuming that m2 is greater than m1 there is a net acceleration causing the mass 2 to fall down and the mass 1 to follow. The problem is that the equations suggest that an increased pulling force (i.e. larger m2) causes an increased coefficient of kinetic friction, furthermore I apply this formula to the data I have and indeed a larger hanging mass gives a greater kinetic friction coefficient. Is this correct? I would have thought it should not effect the coefficient.
upload_2016-2-2_15-31-43.png


Homework Equations


upload_2016-2-2_15-31-23.png

upload_2016-2-2_15-31-32.png

upload_2016-2-2_15-31-37.png

The Attempt at a Solution


Solution already obtained, the question is about the solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you hold your coefficient constant, what would have to change? Is there another term that might be variable in your equation?
 
RUber said:
If you hold your coefficient constant, what would have to change? Is there another term that might be variable in your equation?
the only other variables are m2 and of course the acceleration, but using the data i have for the acceleration which was found using a camera and tracking software, i still find an increasing coefficient of kinetic friction with increasing m2
 
That is interesting. You have data for the two different masses and the acceleration terms are the same?
I would recommend running a third test -- maybe with masses that are close to each other -- clearly acceleration will need to change at some point.
 
Coefficient of friction depends on the surface on which the mass under consideration moves/undergoes relative motion
It has nothing to do with the mass of the body which experiences the frictional force!
 
RUber said:
That is interesting. You have data for the two different masses and the acceleration terms are the same?
I would recommend running a third test -- maybe with masses that are close to each other -- clearly acceleration will need to change at some point.
no, the acceleration does increase with increasing m2, but so does the kinetic friction coefficient. My understanding is that the kinetic friction should be independent of m2 and thus independent of the acceleration but this does not seem to be the case.
 
UchihaClan13 said:
Coefficient of friction depends on the surface on which the mass under consideration moves/undergoes relative motion
It has nothing to do with the mass of the body which experiences the frictional force!
i agree, but the formula and my data do not seem to suggest this, my question is why
 
Could you provide an actual picture of the data you possess??
thanks
UchihaClan13
 
UchihaClan13 said:
Could you provide an actual picture of the data you possess??
thanks
UchihaClan13
Here is the data:
upload_2016-2-2_16-20-53.png

where the paper types are what m1 is being dragged over, and 30,40 and 50g corresponds to mass m2.
 
  • #10
any more ideas?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
6K
Back
Top