Kinetic friction on an incline.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the distance a box slides down an incline with a 13.0° angle and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.370. The box starts at a speed of 1.40 m/s and comes to rest due to the forces acting on it, including gravity and kinetic friction. The correct approach involves using Newton's second law to find acceleration and applying kinematic equations to determine the distance, ultimately leading to a calculated distance of 0.737 meters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations
  • Familiarity with forces acting on objects on an incline
  • Basic trigonometry for resolving forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of forces acting on an object on an incline
  • Learn how to apply kinematic equations in physics problems
  • Explore the concept of friction and its calculation in physics
  • Practice problems involving inclined planes and friction
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of inclined plane problems involving friction.

algar32
Messages
88
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement




A box is sliding down an incline tilted at a 13.0° angle above horizontal. The box is initially sliding down the incline at a speed of 1.40 m/s. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the box and the incline is 0.370. How far does the box slide down the incline before coming to rest?

Homework Equations


mk= Fnormal*ms


The Attempt at a Solution


1.4 m/s in x direction= m*cos(13)
m=1.4368
m*ms= 1.4368*.37=.51363= mk
1.4m/s-.51368mk= .868m
Not sure what I am doing wrong. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
algar32 said:
1.4 m/s in x direction= m*cos(13)
m=1.4368
m*ms= 1.4368*.37=.51363= mk
1.4m/s-.51368mk= .868m
I don't quite understand what you've done or even what your equations mean.

Try this: What forces act on the box? Figure out the resulting acceleration of the box as it slides down the incline.
 
Doc Al said:
I don't quite understand what you've done or even what your equations mean.

Try this: What forces act on the box? Figure out the resulting acceleration of the box as it slides down the incline.

I found mass and then found the amount of kinetic friction. Then I subtracted that from the 1.4 m/s. Ill be honest. I know I am doing it wrong and I have no Idea what I am supposed to do. I guess I will keep googling it until I find something. Thanks.

The force that act on the box are gravity, fnorm, and kinetic friction.
 
algar32 said:
The force that act on the box are gravity, fnorm, and kinetic friction.
Good. Now express the net force parallel to the incline. Then use Newton's 2nd law to find the acceleration.
 
Doc Al said:
Good. Now express the net force parallel to the incline. Then use Newton's 2nd law to find the acceleration.

kinetic friction = not sure. I don't have a mass.
fnormal = not sure don't have mass.
fgravity = not sure don't have a mass

Unless my mass from the first part was correct?
 
algar32 said:
kinetic friction = not sure. I don't have a mass.
fnormal = not sure don't have mass.
fgravity = not sure don't have a mass
You won't need a numerical value for the mass. Just call the mass 'm' and continue. Write expressions for these forces symbolically, not numerically.
Unless my mass from the first part was correct?
Nope.
 
Ok thanks.
kinetic= -.370*m
fnorm= cos(13)*9.8
kinetic +fnorm= 9.17
9.17m=m*a
9.17=a
Is this right^^?
Then how do I find the distance?

Thanks so much.
 
algar32 said:
Ok thanks.
kinetic= -.370*m
No. The force of kinetic friction equals μFnorm.
fnorm= cos(13)*9.8
Not exactly. (But you're close.) First, what does the weight equal? Then how does Fnorm relate to the weight?

Once you find the correction acceleration, you'll use kinematics to find the distance.
 
algar32 said:
kinetic= -.370*m

This is incorrect. Force of kinetic friction = μF_{Normal}

algar32 said:
fnorm= cos(13)*9.8

Good.

algar32 said:
kinetic +fnorm= 9.17
9.17m=m*a
9.17=a
Is this right^^?
Then how do I find the distance?

Thanks so much.

Kinetic friction and the normal force are not on the same plane, you can't add them together. Think about it. What is the only force that is causing the block to deccelerate? After you find the acceleration just use v^{2}=v^{2}_{f}+2ad and solve for distance.
 
  • #10
Doc Al said:
No. The force of kinetic friction equals μFnorm.

Not exactly. (But you're close.) First, what does the weight equal? Then how does Fnorm relate to the weight?

Once you find the correction acceleration, you'll use kinematics to find the distance.

kinetic= -.370* cos(13)*9.8*m
fnorm= cos(13)*9.8*m
kinetic +fnorm= 6.0
6.0m=m*a
6.0 = a

vf^2= vi^2 + 2ad
0= 1.4^2+ 2*(6)*d
d= -.1633
Still not sure what I did wrong :(
 
  • #11
algar32 said:
kinetic +fnorm= 6.0

Again, don't add these two together. Think of it this way. What is your net force and what does friction have to do with it?
 
  • #12
tal444 said:
Again, don't add these two together. Think of it this way. What is your net force and what does friction have to do with it?

Well net force is my overall force right? So I figure you just add them ( I added the negative sign in front of the friction, so It is really like subtracting).
 
  • #13
algar32 said:
kinetic= -.370* cos(13)*9.8*m
Good. That's one of the forces acting parallel to the incline.
fnorm= cos(13)*9.8*m
OK. But realize that this force acts perpendicular (normal) to the incline surface.
kinetic +fnorm= 6.0
Why are you adding those forces? (They don't act in the same direction, for one.) And why are you setting it equal to 6.0?

What you need is the net force parallel to the incline. (What about gravity?)
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
Good. That's one of the forces acting parallel to the incline.

OK. But realize that this force acts perpendicular (normal) to the incline surface.

Why are you adding those forces? (They don't act in the same direction, for one.) And why are you setting it equal to 6.0?

What you need is the net force parallel to the incline. (What about gravity?)

I thought the force normal was no longer perpendicular if I took the cos(13) of it. I thought the cos made it parallel. That is why I was adding them.

Sorry I was unclear. i wasn't setting it equal to 6.0. That is what it equaled when added.

ughh so confused! :(
 
  • #15
Thanks for your help thus far but, I am clearly not competent enough to do this problem. Can someone just show me the equations I need and I will try to figure it out.
 
  • #16
algar32 said:
I thought the force normal was no longer perpendicular if I took the cos(13) of it. I thought the cos made it parallel. That is why I was adding them.
No. Multiplying the weight (mg) by cosθ gives you the normal force, which is perpendicular to the surface. But the friction force is parallel. To get the friction force, multiply the normal force by μ.

But the friction force is just one of the forces. The other force is the component of the weight parallel to the surface. Hint: If multiplying the weight by cosθ gives you the perpendicular component of the weight (which is equal to the normal force), what would you need to multiply the weight by to get the parallel component?
 
  • #17
Doc Al said:
No. Multiplying the weight (mg) by cosθ gives you the normal force, which is perpendicular to the surface. But the friction force is parallel. To get the friction force, multiply the normal force by μ.

But the friction force is just one of the forces. The other force is the component of the weight parallel to the surface. Hint: If multiplying the weight by cosθ gives you the perpendicular component of the weight (which is equal to the normal force), what would you need to multiply the weight by to get the parallel component?

kinetic= -.370* cos(13)*9.8*m
fgrav (weight)= m*9.8*sin(13)
acceleration= -1.329
0= 1.4^2+2(-1.329)d
d=.737

WE DID IT. I LOVE YOU FOREVER!
Thanks.
 
  • #18
Nice work.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K