Kinetic friction on an incline.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a box sliding down an incline at a 13.0° angle with an initial speed of 1.40 m/s and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.370. The objective is to determine the distance the box slides before coming to rest.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the box, including gravity, normal force, and kinetic friction. There is confusion regarding the correct application of these forces and how to express them mathematically. Some participants attempt to calculate the net force and acceleration but express uncertainty about their methods and results.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with participants providing guidance on identifying forces and applying Newton's laws. There is a mix of attempts to clarify concepts and correct misunderstandings, with some participants expressing frustration and seeking direct equations or solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of not having a numerical value for mass and the implications this has on their calculations. There is ongoing confusion about the relationship between the forces acting on the box and how to properly account for them in the context of the problem.

algar32
Messages
88
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement




A box is sliding down an incline tilted at a 13.0° angle above horizontal. The box is initially sliding down the incline at a speed of 1.40 m/s. The coefficient of kinetic friction between the box and the incline is 0.370. How far does the box slide down the incline before coming to rest?

Homework Equations


mk= Fnormal*ms


The Attempt at a Solution


1.4 m/s in x direction= m*cos(13)
m=1.4368
m*ms= 1.4368*.37=.51363= mk
1.4m/s-.51368mk= .868m
Not sure what I am doing wrong. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
algar32 said:
1.4 m/s in x direction= m*cos(13)
m=1.4368
m*ms= 1.4368*.37=.51363= mk
1.4m/s-.51368mk= .868m
I don't quite understand what you've done or even what your equations mean.

Try this: What forces act on the box? Figure out the resulting acceleration of the box as it slides down the incline.
 
Doc Al said:
I don't quite understand what you've done or even what your equations mean.

Try this: What forces act on the box? Figure out the resulting acceleration of the box as it slides down the incline.

I found mass and then found the amount of kinetic friction. Then I subtracted that from the 1.4 m/s. Ill be honest. I know I am doing it wrong and I have no Idea what I am supposed to do. I guess I will keep googling it until I find something. Thanks.

The force that act on the box are gravity, fnorm, and kinetic friction.
 
algar32 said:
The force that act on the box are gravity, fnorm, and kinetic friction.
Good. Now express the net force parallel to the incline. Then use Newton's 2nd law to find the acceleration.
 
Doc Al said:
Good. Now express the net force parallel to the incline. Then use Newton's 2nd law to find the acceleration.

kinetic friction = not sure. I don't have a mass.
fnormal = not sure don't have mass.
fgravity = not sure don't have a mass

Unless my mass from the first part was correct?
 
algar32 said:
kinetic friction = not sure. I don't have a mass.
fnormal = not sure don't have mass.
fgravity = not sure don't have a mass
You won't need a numerical value for the mass. Just call the mass 'm' and continue. Write expressions for these forces symbolically, not numerically.
Unless my mass from the first part was correct?
Nope.
 
Ok thanks.
kinetic= -.370*m
fnorm= cos(13)*9.8
kinetic +fnorm= 9.17
9.17m=m*a
9.17=a
Is this right^^?
Then how do I find the distance?

Thanks so much.
 
algar32 said:
Ok thanks.
kinetic= -.370*m
No. The force of kinetic friction equals μFnorm.
fnorm= cos(13)*9.8
Not exactly. (But you're close.) First, what does the weight equal? Then how does Fnorm relate to the weight?

Once you find the correction acceleration, you'll use kinematics to find the distance.
 
algar32 said:
kinetic= -.370*m

This is incorrect. Force of kinetic friction = μF_{Normal}

algar32 said:
fnorm= cos(13)*9.8

Good.

algar32 said:
kinetic +fnorm= 9.17
9.17m=m*a
9.17=a
Is this right^^?
Then how do I find the distance?

Thanks so much.

Kinetic friction and the normal force are not on the same plane, you can't add them together. Think about it. What is the only force that is causing the block to deccelerate? After you find the acceleration just use v^{2}=v^{2}_{f}+2ad and solve for distance.
 
  • #10
Doc Al said:
No. The force of kinetic friction equals μFnorm.

Not exactly. (But you're close.) First, what does the weight equal? Then how does Fnorm relate to the weight?

Once you find the correction acceleration, you'll use kinematics to find the distance.

kinetic= -.370* cos(13)*9.8*m
fnorm= cos(13)*9.8*m
kinetic +fnorm= 6.0
6.0m=m*a
6.0 = a

vf^2= vi^2 + 2ad
0= 1.4^2+ 2*(6)*d
d= -.1633
Still not sure what I did wrong :(
 
  • #11
algar32 said:
kinetic +fnorm= 6.0

Again, don't add these two together. Think of it this way. What is your net force and what does friction have to do with it?
 
  • #12
tal444 said:
Again, don't add these two together. Think of it this way. What is your net force and what does friction have to do with it?

Well net force is my overall force right? So I figure you just add them ( I added the negative sign in front of the friction, so It is really like subtracting).
 
  • #13
algar32 said:
kinetic= -.370* cos(13)*9.8*m
Good. That's one of the forces acting parallel to the incline.
fnorm= cos(13)*9.8*m
OK. But realize that this force acts perpendicular (normal) to the incline surface.
kinetic +fnorm= 6.0
Why are you adding those forces? (They don't act in the same direction, for one.) And why are you setting it equal to 6.0?

What you need is the net force parallel to the incline. (What about gravity?)
 
  • #14
Doc Al said:
Good. That's one of the forces acting parallel to the incline.

OK. But realize that this force acts perpendicular (normal) to the incline surface.

Why are you adding those forces? (They don't act in the same direction, for one.) And why are you setting it equal to 6.0?

What you need is the net force parallel to the incline. (What about gravity?)

I thought the force normal was no longer perpendicular if I took the cos(13) of it. I thought the cos made it parallel. That is why I was adding them.

Sorry I was unclear. i wasn't setting it equal to 6.0. That is what it equaled when added.

ughh so confused! :(
 
  • #15
Thanks for your help thus far but, I am clearly not competent enough to do this problem. Can someone just show me the equations I need and I will try to figure it out.
 
  • #16
algar32 said:
I thought the force normal was no longer perpendicular if I took the cos(13) of it. I thought the cos made it parallel. That is why I was adding them.
No. Multiplying the weight (mg) by cosθ gives you the normal force, which is perpendicular to the surface. But the friction force is parallel. To get the friction force, multiply the normal force by μ.

But the friction force is just one of the forces. The other force is the component of the weight parallel to the surface. Hint: If multiplying the weight by cosθ gives you the perpendicular component of the weight (which is equal to the normal force), what would you need to multiply the weight by to get the parallel component?
 
  • #17
Doc Al said:
No. Multiplying the weight (mg) by cosθ gives you the normal force, which is perpendicular to the surface. But the friction force is parallel. To get the friction force, multiply the normal force by μ.

But the friction force is just one of the forces. The other force is the component of the weight parallel to the surface. Hint: If multiplying the weight by cosθ gives you the perpendicular component of the weight (which is equal to the normal force), what would you need to multiply the weight by to get the parallel component?

kinetic= -.370* cos(13)*9.8*m
fgrav (weight)= m*9.8*sin(13)
acceleration= -1.329
0= 1.4^2+2(-1.329)d
d=.737

WE DID IT. I LOVE YOU FOREVER!
Thanks.
 
  • #18
Nice work.
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
681
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K