Kirchhoff's law: Find the current I3 through the Amp meter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a circuit using Kirchhoff's laws, specifically finding the current I3 through an amp meter. The initial equations for the upper and lower loops were adjusted after identifying an error related to an extra resistor. The corrected equations led to the calculation of I3 as 0.336 A, with subsequent values for I1 and I2 determined as 2.43 A and 2.09 A, respectively. However, a verification of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law indicated a discrepancy, suggesting that the results could be more accurate with slight adjustments. The final values for I2 and I3 were confirmed to remain consistent despite the need for more precise calculations for I1.
skibidi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find the current I3,I2, and I1 through the Amp meter.
Answer in units of A.
Relevant Equations
I used the Junction Rule - I3= I1+I2
I separated the circuit into parts- upper and lower

For the upper loop I wrote: -14-2I1-3.4I3-I2 = 0
For the lower loop I wrote 16-2.9I2+3.4I3-5.4I2 = 0

I solved for I1 and I2 separately and plugged it into the junction rule and solved for I3.

I may have got it wrong because of the incorporation of the extra resistor in the upper loop and lower loop and solved incorrectly.

Utexas.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Correction for the problem after i found I3 correctly now.

The correct equation is now -14+3.3(I1)+3.4(I3)+2(I1)= 0 for the upper loop and
-16+5.3(I2)-3.4(I3)+2.9(I2) = 0 for the bottom loop. Once you separate variables, I2 = stuff and I1 = stuff, you can use the junction rule I1 = I2+I3 and rearrange to get I1-I2=I3. Plug it in and you should get I3 = 0.336A
 
Use I3 to get I2 and I1 since you have separate equations for them already -

I1 = -3.4(I3)+14/5.3 and I2 = 3.4(I3) +16/ 8.2

I1 = 2.43 A , I2 = 2.09 A
 
If anyone else sees this, can you verify that my explanation is correct since I was able to get the correct answers on my own.
 
## \text { The explanation is correct, but the result can be more accurate. } ##

## 3,3 \Omega \cdot 2,43 A + ( - 14 ) V + 2 \Omega \cdot 2,43 A + 3,4 \Omega \cdot 0,336 A = ##
## = 8,0058 V – 14 V + 4,852 V + 1,1424 V = ##
## = 0,0214 V \neq 0 V ##
## \text { It is hard to say that Kirchhoff Voltage Law is satisfied for the upper loop because it is hard to say that } 0,0214 V \text { is equal to } 0 V \text { . } ##
## \text { The more accurate result can be got rounding the value of } I _ 1 \text { to } 2,426 A \text { instead of } 2,43 A \text { . } ##
## \text { Values of } I _ 2 \text { , which is } 2,090 A \text { , and } I _ 3 \text { , which is } 0,336 A \text { , can remain the same. } ##
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top