Kirchoffs Laws and Thevinen Equivalent

  • Thread starter Thread starter coldturkey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent Laws
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on applying Kirchhoff's Laws and Thevenin's Theorem to find voltage and current in an RL circuit. The correct Thevenin voltage (Vth) is established at 76 Volts, while discrepancies in the Kirchhoff analysis arise from improper labeling of mesh currents. The recommendation is to utilize mesh current analysis and matrices to solve the equations accurately. Additionally, users are encouraged to leverage circuit simulation tools like Multisim for verification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Laws
  • Familiarity with Thevenin's Theorem
  • Knowledge of mesh current analysis
  • Experience with circuit simulation software such as Multisim
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to apply mesh current analysis in circuit problems
  • Explore the use of matrices for solving systems of equations in circuit analysis
  • Investigate the features and capabilities of Multisim for circuit simulation
  • Review tutorials on Thevenin's Theorem and its applications in electrical engineering
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of circuit analysis techniques using Kirchhoff's Laws and Thevenin's Theorem.

coldturkey
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I have a question here which asks me to find the Voltage and Current of RL in two different ways: using Kirchoffs Laws and then Thevinens Theorem.

I have tried it a couple times and get different answers using each method.

Perhaps somebody could tell me where I have gone wrong or if somebody that has access to multisim or some other circuit emulator could enter in the circuit and tell me what the answer is that would be a huge help.

Attached is my workings and a picture of the circuit.
P.s. sorry for the handwriting (its my quick working writing).

Many thanks

Untitled1212.jpg

Untitled123123.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your Vth is correct in the thevenin example, it is indeed 76 Volts. I'm guessing you messed up a sign somewhere in the Kirchoff example--- being the nice person I am I'll try to find it for you :D

Also I'll check your Thevenin Rth by using a short circuit current method.
 
Whoops nm i didnt know that they gave you the resistance of the load! With that in mind, with your Thevenin voltage you can easily find the current through the load.
 
For your Kirchoff example, I found your mistake--- although your method is on the right track, you would do well to make use of Mesh Currents... that is, instead of labeling i1, i2, i3 etc... you should label each in terms of mesh currents... that is--- i1 would equal the current ia thru first mesh minus ib current through second etc...

Do that, use matrices to solve your system of equations, and you should get it.

And might I add, don't use a supermesh in this problem!
 
Thanks heaps.
I knew one of them would be right, and the thevinen is the simpler one to do, but i couldn't see where I went wrong in the kirchhoffs one. I will have another crack. Cheers
 
Oh, did you put the circuit in multisim to make sure it is correct? Thanks
 
I don't have Pspice or any other relevant software installed on my laptop, and I'm not at home unfortunately!

I don't doubt that it's correct.

Check your EE dept's IEEE student branch or local EE student organizations to see if they hold Pspice, Hspice, Multisim, Matlab, etc tutorials, you'd definitely benefit from them when you take the harder courses in ckt theory and digital design!
 
I still can't find the error in my kirchhoffs one. Could you point me to the right part?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K