Kirchoff's method for a weird circuit

  • #1
373
3

Homework Statement


In the following circuit, the battery has emf ε = 12.7 V. The resistors are R1 = 2000 Ω . R2 = 3000 Ω, and R3 = 4000 Ω. What is the current through resistor R2 ?

Homework Equations


Kirchoff's Rules
V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


i0 (into A) - i2 (current into resistor 2) - i3 (current into resistor 3) = 0
Then what happens at C and B?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
373
3
For some reason the image failed to upload. Here it is
kirchoff.png
 
  • #3
berkeman
Mentor
59,076
9,178

Homework Statement


In the following circuit, the battery has emf ε = 12.7 V. The resistors are R1 = 2000 Ω . R2 = 3000 Ω, and R3 = 4000 Ω. What is the current through resistor R2 ?

Homework Equations


Kirchoff's Rules
V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


i0 (into A) - i2 (current into resistor 2) - i3 (current into resistor 3) = 0
Then what happens at C and B?
There may be simpler ways to solve this, but just go ahead and write the KCL equations and try it that way. Please show your work... :smile:
 
  • #4
SammyS
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
11,359
1,031
Here is a thread with a similar circuit.
 
  • #5
373
3
There may be simpler ways to solve this, but just go ahead and write the KCL equations and try it that way. Please show your work... :smile:
i0 = initial current
i1 = current to R2
i2 = current to R1
i3 = current to R3
i4 = current to lower R1
i5 = current to lower R2

i0 - i1 - i2 = 0
i3 + i1 - i4 = 0
i2 - i3 - i5 = 0
-i2R1 - i3R3 + i1R2 = 0
-i5R2 + i4R1 + i3R3 = 0
12.7 - i1R2 - i4R1 = 0
 
Last edited:
  • #6
373
3
The currents are as follows from i0 to i5
.0052
.0024
.0028
.0004
.0028
.0024
Since the ones through R1 and R2 are identical, it does seem like there is an easier way to solve this, but how?
 
  • #7
berkeman
Mentor
59,076
9,178
Since the ones through R1 and R2 are identical, it does seem like there is an easier way to solve this, but how?
Did you read through the thread that SammyS linked to in post #4? :smile:
 
  • #8
NascentOxygen
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
9,244
1,072
i0 = initial current
i1 = current to R2
i2 = current to R1
i3 = current to R3
i4= current to lower R1 = i2 + i3
i5= current to lower R2 = i1 - i3
It is usually preferable to not involve more current variables than are needed, to minimise the amount of algebra it generates. Once you label 3 currents, the others are already defined in terms of those 3 so they can be marked on the schematic accordingly.
 
  • #9
373
3
It is usually preferable to not involve more current variables than are needed, to minimise the amount of algebra it generates. Once you label 3 currents, the others are already defined in terms of those 3 so they can be marked on the schematic accordingly.
So in the end, I only need 5 equations?

12.7 - i1R2 - (i1 + i3)R1 = 0
-i2R1 - i3R3 + i1R2 = 0
i3R3 - (i1+i3)R2 + i5R1 = 0
i0 - i1 - i2 = 0
i2 - i3 - i5 = 0 or i1 + i3 - i2 = 0
 
Last edited:
  • #10
373
3
Did you read through the thread that SammyS linked to in post #4? :smile:
Yes, the currents through R2 are the same and so are the ones for R1 because reversing the polarities would give an identical result.

So that means i4 = i2 and i1 = i5
i0 - i1 - i2 = 0
i2 - i3 - i1 = 0 or i1 + i3 - i2 = 0
12.7 - i1R2 - i2R1 = 0
-i2R1 - i3R3 + i1R2 = 0
i3R3 - i1R2 + i2R1 = 0
?

But I'm not all convinced about the reversing polarities proof. Who's to say that once the current passes through the bridge and all the other junctions, it's the same?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
gneill
Mentor
20,913
2,862
But I'm not all convinced about the reversing polarities proof. Who's to say that once the current passes through the bridge and all the other junctions, it's the same?
Symmetry says so. If you can flip or rotate a circuit about one or more axes of symmetry and the result is identical to the original circuit, then the resulting circuit must behave identically to the original and the symmetric pairs of circuit elements must display the same behavior (current, potential difference).

Take your original circuit and rotate it 180°. Doing so cannot change the circuit behavior since no connections have changed (the topology remains the same).
upload_2016-4-21_18-15-14.png


Note that the bridge circuit still has the same values of resistance in all the same locations. The potential supplied by the voltage source has the opposite polarity in this view (negative at top rather than positive at top), but the polarity that we assign + and - potentials and current directions are just a matter of convention. You can change from assuming positive charge carriers to negative charge carriers without affecting any equations. So the symmetry pairs of resistances must carry the same currents in both orientations.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #12
373
3
i0 - i1 - i2 = 0
i3 + i1 - i4 = 0
i2 - i3 - i5 = 0
-i2R1 - i3R3 + i1R2 = 0
-i5R2 + i4R1 + i3R3 = 0
12.7 - i1R2 - i4R1 = 0
Symmetry says so. If you can flip or rotate a circuit about one or more axes of symmetry and the result is identical to the original circuit, then the resulting circuit must behave identically to the original and the symmetric pairs of circuit elements must display the same behavior (current, potential difference).

Take your original circuit and rotate it 180°. Doing so cannot change the circuit behavior since no connections have changed (the topology remains the same).
View attachment 99483

Note that the bridge circuit still has the same values of resistance in all the same locations. The potential supplied by the voltage source has the opposite polarity in this view (negative at top rather than positive at top), but the polarity that we assign + and - potentials and current directions are just a matter of convention. You can change from assuming positive charge carriers to negative charge carriers without affecting any equations. So the symmetry pairs of resistances must carry the same currents in both orientations.
Are you trying to say that the current into point A for the non-rotated circuit is the same as the current flowing into point D for the rotated circuit?
 
  • #13
gneill
Mentor
20,913
2,862
i0 - i1 - i2 = 0
i3 + i1 - i4 = 0
i2 - i3 - i5 = 0
-i2R1 - i3R3 + i1R2 = 0
-i5R2 + i4R1 + i3R3 = 0
12.7 - i1R2 - i4R1 = 0

Are you trying to say that the current into point A for the non-rotated circuit is the same as the current flowing into point D for the rotated circuit?
The magnitude is certainly the same. Change the polarity of the voltage source and the signs of the currents will agree too.

Besides, how could they be different, since the same current that leaves the battery must return to it?
 
  • #14
373
3
The magnitude is certainly the same. Change the polarity of the voltage source and the signs of the currents will agree too.

Besides, how could they be different, since the same current that leaves the battery must return to it?
Right, charge is conserved. If all the resistors were different, would the current still be the same?
 
  • #15
gneill
Mentor
20,913
2,862
Right, charge is conserved. If all the resistors were different, would the current still be the same?
Which current? Certainly the current entering (or leaving) node A via the battery is the same as the current leaving (or entering) node D via the battery.
 
  • #16
373
3
Which current? Certainly the current entering (or leaving) node A via the battery is the same as the current leaving (or entering) node D via the battery.
I see, so only currents through same resistors will have the same magnitude?
 
  • #17
gneill
Mentor
20,913
2,862
I see, so only currents through same resistors will have the same magnitude?
Rephrase that as "The currents through the symmetrically paired resistors will be the same" and you would be right. Don't overspecify by saying "only". Some circuits may have resistors of different values that happen to have the same magnitude of current.
 
  • #18
373
3
Rephrase that as "The currents through the symmetrically paired resistors will be the same" and you would be right. Don't overspecify by saying "only". Some circuits may have resistors of different values that happen to have the same magnitude of current.
The currents through the symmetrically paired resistors will be the same.
What if the resistors have different resistances?
 
  • #19
SammyS
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
11,359
1,031
The currents through the symmetrically paired resistors will be the same.
What if the resistors have different resistances?
Will there still be the same symmetry?

Precisely which resistances will you change?
 
  • #20
373
3
Will there still be the same symmetry?

Precisely which resistances will you change?
In the un-rotated figure: top left resistor is R1 top right is R2. Bottom left is R3, bottom right is R4. The bridge resistor is R5.
 
  • #21
SammyS
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
11,359
1,031
The currents through the symmetrically paired resistors will be the same.
What if the resistors have different resistances?
Then the currents will be affected. No more assumptions about one current being the same as another.
 

Related Threads on Kirchoff's method for a weird circuit

  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
291
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
17K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Top