A Kirkendall effect: vacancy concentration and pair interaction energy

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the Kirkendall effect and its modeling through a kinetic Monte Carlo approach for a core-shell binary alloy nanoparticle. The model features a faster diffusing species A in the core and a slower diffusing species B in the shell, with specific assumptions about pair-interaction energies and attempt frequencies. Equation (1) is highlighted as crucial for achieving a reasonable calculation speed and an equilibrium vacancy composition close to that at the melting temperature. The chosen reduced pair-interaction energy of -1.5 aims to ensure accurate vacancy composition in both pure and binary alloy systems. The connection to the Ostwald-Freundlich equation is noted as an interesting observation.
always_learning
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Relationship between vacancy concentration and pair interaction energy in a core-shell binary spherical nanoparticle on a f.c.c. lattice - where does it come from?
I am reading the following article on Kirkendall effect leading to the Formation of a hollow binary alloy nanosphere: a kinetic montecarlo study. I am unable to understand or find in references the reasoning to obtain equation (1):

Let us consider a kinetic Monte Carlo model of a core-shell binary spherical nanoparticle on a rigid f.c.c. lattice with lattice parameter ##a##, where ##N_A = 45995## atoms of the faster diffuse species A are located in the core with radius ##r_c \sim 14a## whilst ##N_B = 30434## atoms of the slower diffuse species B form the shell with external radius ##r_s \sim 16.58a##. We assume that the three nearest neighbour pair-interaction energies are equal ##\phi_{AA}=\phi_{BB}=\phi_{AB}## but the effective attempt frequencies ##\nu_{A0}## and ##\nu_{B0}## of A and B atoms for exchange with a vacancy are strongly different ##\nu_{A0} / \nu_{B0} =10^3## and do not depend on the local arrangement of a vacancy. This model has a zero enthalpy of mixing. Furthermore, it has been shown [12,14-16] that with an appropriate choice of reduced pair-interaction energy ##\phi/kT## and using the equation:
$$-6\phi/kt \sim \frac{1}{(1-2c_v^{eq})} \ln{\left(\frac{1-c_v^{eq}}{c_v^{eq}}\right)} \quad (1)$$
for a pure element f.c.c. system it is possible to fulfil two requirements necessary for our numerical simulation. These are a reasonable calculation speed and a value of the equilibrium vacancy composition ##c_v^{eq}## sufficiently close to the vacancy composition at the melting temperature ##T_m## of a typical crystalline solid. For the case of very small ##c_v^{eq}## Eq. (1) will correctly describe an equilibrium vacancy composition in a model of a binary alloy with equal pair-interaction energies.
In this case, the vacancy formation energy will not depend on the atomic distributions and the additional configurational entropy term for vacancies appearing in a binary alloy will be negligible (for details see [18]). Following these reasons, the reduced pair-interaction energy ##\phi/kT = -1.5## was chosen using Eq. (1) to provide an equilibrium vacancy composition of ##c_v \sim 1.24×10^{-4}## in pure A and B as well as in a binary A-B alloy of f.c.c. systems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
18K