Kitten raising advice

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around raising a kitten named Sprinkles, focusing on her behavior, training methods, and the challenges faced by a new pet owner. Participants explore various aspects of kitten behavior, including play aggression, stimulation needs, and the impact of early separation from her mother.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Sprinkles' aggressive lunging and biting could be normal kitten behavior, while others caution that it should be monitored and discouraged if it appears overly aggressive.
  • There are differing views on whether Sprinkles is over-stimulated or under-stimulated, with some proposing that she may need more interaction and playtime, while others argue that kittens are naturally rambunctious.
  • A participant mentions the importance of socialization and suggests that as Sprinkles grows, she may become more comfortable around the dog and engage in more natural social interactions.
  • One participant proposes a controversial method of handling Sprinkles by mimicking her mother’s behavior, suggesting that dominance and control are necessary for training, while another participant expresses concern about the potential trauma from her neck injuries.
  • Another participant shares personal experiences with aggressive kittens and suggests using a laser pen to tire her out before engaging in petting, indicating that tiring her out could reduce aggressive play.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions on Sprinkles' behavior and training methods, with no clear consensus on the best approach. Some agree on the need to monitor her aggression, while others emphasize the importance of play and stimulation.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved concerns regarding Sprinkles' neck injuries and their impact on her behavior and training. Participants also highlight the complexity of kitten behavior and the challenges of socializing a young animal.

Who May Find This Useful

New pet owners, particularly those with kittens, as well as individuals interested in animal behavior and training techniques.

  • #61
DaveC426913 said:
As with dogs: don't blame the pet, blame the owner.
No one seems to be doing that though, see above.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #62
Where I come from in the US hawks, bald eagles, coyotes, etc prey on the cats. If the feral and outdoor cats that keep the mice and rats cleaned up leave, I will have something worse. I've read that fox will take a cat but I can't say from experience. Right now the fox are close enough I don't need them moving in closer to get rats when the cats are gone.
-
Forgot the one I hate the most. Racoons will also kill young cats.
 
Last edited:
  • #63
Averagesupernova said:
Where I come from in the US hawks, bald eagles, coyotes, etc prey on the cats
Can we have some? We currently have 12 million cats killing 270 wild animals per year.
We send over some Patterdale terriers in return.
 
  • #64
pinball1970 said:
Can we have some? We currently have 12 million cats killing 270 wild animals per year.
We send over some Patterdale terriers in return.
You really did miss the point of my post. What do you suppose the coyotes, etc will eat when the cats are gone? Right now the cats survive on the rodents. Eagles and hawks do too, as well as a cat now and then. Coyotes and fox mostly survive on rabbits, gophers, etc and now and then a cat. With the cats gone we can expect the rodent population to explode which will draw the fox and coyotes in closer since rodents (not all of them) reside closer to buildings. I don't need nor want those critters up close to where I reside.
 
  • #65
Averagesupernova said:
You really did miss the point of my post
I did not. I made a reference to domestic cats killing birds and small mammals, they also kill reptiles and fish in the UK. They are not particularly efficient at killing rats and when a problem arises with rats and other rodents in premises including factories, warehousing and farms we do not go out and buy a cat to solve the problem. That is not the efficient or humane way to do it.

I never mentioned wild/feral cats.

I am not aware of your finely balanced eco system relying on cats, I just pointed out domestic cats kill about 2 billion birds in the US every year.
 
  • #66
pinball1970 said:
I did not. I made a reference to domestic cats killing birds and small mammals, they also kill reptiles and fish in the UK. They are not particularly efficient at killing rats and when a problem arises with rats and other rodents in premises including factories, warehousing and farms we do not go out and buy a cat to solve the problem. That is not the efficient or humane way to do it.

I never mentioned wild/feral cats.

I am not aware of your finely balanced eco system relying on cats, I just pointed out domestic cats kill about 2 billion birds in the US every year.
As I often say, you do you and I'll do me. Maybe that's not a familiar thing across the pond. I can tell you this much: Our cats generally have no problem with rats. And I fail to see the concern of a humane way to deal with rats or mice. The preferred method (not mine) to deal with mice in the US seems to be sticky traps. I can't think of a less humane way to take care of mice but I don't really care. It's just an observation. I question the validity of the 2 billion birds per year. A quick Google tells me 3.12 million square miles on the Continental US. That amounts 1 kill per acre per year. Google also tells me there are between 75 and 90 million cats in the US. That's over 23,000 birds per cat per year. Even if the numbers are off 10:1 that means each cat kill 2300 birds per year. 6 birds per day per cat. Sorry, not buying it.
 
  • Agree
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #67
Averagesupernova said:
I've read that fox will take a cat but I can't say from experience.
It's kind of similar as how cats are with rats. Happens, but not too often - the disparity is not big enough, and an adult cat can do some really ugly work on the front parts of a fox, so an experienced fox will rather think twice...

pinball1970 said:
We currently have 12 million cats killing 270 wild animals per year.
These issues are lot more complicated than just those numbers. If you have ten thousand small birds then around fifty thousand of them (!) needs to die yearly to maintain a stable population. And the only thing happens when there is not enough dying is that some plague or famine will take the excess a bit later (happens regularly with tits, for example - feeding and population increase made the 10+ yearly recurring avian pox kind of ever-present here...)
And there are no regular wild predators for the niche of cats (active within our 'humanized' environment). In our neighborhood it's either cats or pox. Or famine. Or some parasites, accidents and so on.

On the other side, cats also has an insane reproduction rate. The things above are true on them too, so it's either leaving them on their own devices and accepting the natural loss rate, or controlling them some way: regardless of the birds.
 
  • #68
Rive said:
It's kind of similar as how cats are with rats. Happens, but not too often - the disparity is not big enough, and an adult cat can do some really ugly work on the front parts of a fox, so an experienced fox will rather think twice...
Agreed, except the rat part. I've seen a cat take rats out quite easily. That's not to say half grown cats will not exercise caution. Full grown cats in my experience have no trouble.
-
The thing with rats is that they are generally smart enough to move off the premises if the cats start controlling them. A rat is a pretty good meal for the cat so unless there are large numbers of cats that suddenly move in to control an existing rat population a small number of rats are actually killed compared to the general population. The remaining rats simply move to a better area.
 
  • #69
Averagesupernova said:
Full grown cats in my experience have no trouble.
Some cats has it (the genetics part of hunting dangerous or bigger prey) in them (consequently sometimes half the street has it in them...), but in general hunt of this kind does not happens too frequently.
 
  • #70
Rive said:
Some cats has it (the genetics part of hunting dangerous or bigger prey) in them (consequently sometimes half the street has it in them...), but in general hunt of this kind does not happens too frequently.
I'll agree there is a huge difference in cats when it comes to their ability to survive. I guess nature has probably selected out the poor ones in my case.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970 and Rive
  • #71
  • #72
Rive said:
Useless. They learn fast, and after a week those bells won't give a sound during hunts anymore (but they can actually endanger the cat, just as those flea-collars can).
Not the advice given here,

" we estimate that a minimum of 0.3 million birds are released annually by cat owners but subsequently die. Substantial welfare improvements could be achieved if owners were more prepared to adopt strategies to limit hunting behaviour (eg fitting cats with collars and bells)"

https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...habilitators/F19BF2AAC8E4D5A884F3F2711927BB7F
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #73
Rive said:
If you have ten thousand small birds then around fifty thousand of them (!) needs to die yearly to maintain a stable population
We agree there, one thing cats can do well, is keep populations down.

"Feral cats on islands are responsible for at least 14% global bird, mammal, and reptile extinctions and are the principal threat to almost 8% of critically endangered birds, mammals, and reptiles."

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02464.x

"Our findings suggest that free-ranging cats cause substantially greater wildlife mortality than previously thought and are likely the single greatest source of anthropogenic mortality for US birds and mammals. Scientifically sound conservation and policy intervention is needed to reduce this impact."

https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2380?WT.mc_id=FBK_NCOMMS#abstract
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #74
symbolipoint said:
Indecisive!
I have posted a few studies to @Rive and @Averagesupernova, have a look at those too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #75
pinball1970 said:
Not the advice given here
Not an article about the effectiveness of bell collars.
Regarding the scientific status of the matter you should take a look at the relevant wiki article (not primarily as a direct source, but as a general insight on the 'depth' of the sources available...)

pinball1970 said:
Feral cats on islands
Species in different environments brings different impact and depending on the situation may count as invasive. Yep.
...but UK and US won't be good just as some really big islands, I guess...

pinball1970 said:
Our findings suggest that free-ranging cats cause substantially greater wildlife mortality than previously thought
UK will do?
Feral cat numbers supposedly declining
Bird number also declining
Primary bird issues

For me the situation actually suggests that local hotspots created by not enough predators and misunderstood 'protection' (unnecessary feeding) may affect the disease situation, across multiple species (including not directly affected ones)
 
Last edited:
  • #76
Rive said:
effectiveness of bell collars
This article mentions the points you raised and possible solutions.

https://scienceinsights.org/why-do-people-put-bells-on-cats-and-should-you/

"Bells aren’t the only option, and for bird protection specifically, they’re not even the most effective one. A few alternatives have been studied:

Bright collar covers: The Birdsbesafe collar cover is a brightly colored fabric sleeve that fits over a cat’s collar. Because birds have excellent color vision, the vivid colors act as a visual warning. Studies found cats wearing these covers brought home 61% fewer birds, outperforming bells. The tradeoff is that they don’t help with mammals, which rely more on hearing and smell than color vision.

Neoprene bibs: The CatBib is a small flap that hangs from the collar and physically interferes with a cat’s ability to use its paws during a pounce. Studies found it prevented 81% of successful bird catches and 45% of mammal catches, making it one of the most effective options tested.

Electronic sound devices: Some collars emit a beep at regular intervals rather than relying on movement to trigger a sound. These performed similarly to bells in studies, reducing hunting success at roughly the same rate.

Combining methods, like using a bell alongside a bright collar cover, can address both bird and mammal prey more comprehensively than any single approach.”

Also this but I only have the abstract. A bit of a mixed bag.

https://www.researchgate.net/public...mestic_Cats_in_a_Continental_European_Setting

"Our results are in line with previous findings from Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom and highlight the great potential of visual and acoustic cues in reducing hunting success in domestic cats also in Continental Europe. On the other hand, our result show that the number of prey brought home by cats overestimates their hunting bag, if scavenging is not considered."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #77
pinball1970 said:
A bit of a mixed bag.
A bit worse than that, at least in the present context: the investigation was based on only two week long periods.

pinball1970 said:
This article
What is that 'scienceinsights' thing, actually?
 
  • #78
Rive said:
A bit worse than that, at least in the present context: the investigation was based on only two week long periods.
This is more comprehensive.
Break away collars, paper collars discussed briefly, at least wild life consideration are discussed.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558787822000867

Rive said:
What is that 'scienceinsights' thing, actually?
First time seeing it, thought it was relevant and the points were not crazy. Possibly ideas taken from published papers.
 
  • #79
I've put as much effort into this as I care to. The claim of 2 billion bird deaths a year in the USA caused by cats is absurd and I've pointed out why.
-
In jury duty in the US jurors are allowed to dismiss testimony from a specific witness if they consider the testimony to be unbelievable. Not just the parts that are unbelievable, anything the specific witness said. It's as if that specific witness never testified. I'm exercising the same thing here. I'm not going to put effort into this discussion. I have ideas of why these inflated numbers exist but I'm not going to go into it here.
 
  • #80
pinball1970 said:
DaveC426913 said:
pinball1970 said:
I actually detest cats Dave. They are selfish predators that decimate wild life, have fleas, hair, feces....
As with dogs: don't blame the pet, blame the owner.
No one seems to be doing that though, see above.
🤔 "I actually detest cats because..." sure makes it sound like it's the cats taking the brunt of your ire...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Averagesupernova
  • #81
(Something is wrong with the display and sequences in reading links in/from the Alerts.)

I had to look for and find post #55. pinball1970 reminded me of a link which I still did not read, just after I posted a single word message of "Indecisive". pinball 1970 asked a question there, but I not being sure if I am ready to say "yes" or "no", cannot decide; so I gave the message of "Indecisive".
 
  • #82
DaveC426913 said:
🤔 "I actually detest cats because..." sure makes it sound like it's the cats taking the brunt of your ire...
Every single point I have posted I have put a scientific study and a few articles to go with it.
The title is "Kitten raising advice" yes? My advice besides don't get one ;) Is keep it in doors and consider one of the collar options. Cats escape.

I will bow out now, before I cause further upset.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #83
pinball1970 said:
Cats escape.
She did escape once. We found her within 30 seconds, six feet from the door, entranced by a pile of the dog's poop.

pinball1970 said:
I will bow out now, before I cause further upset.
No upset. Just friendly banter. Just bustin' yer b*lls. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
23K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 895 ·
30
Replies
895
Views
100K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
42
Views
8K