Let ##\vec {A}## be an arbitrary vector and let ##\hat {n}## be a unit vector in some fixed direction. Show that [tex] \vec {A} = (\vec{A} \cdot \hat {n})\hat{n} + (\hat {n} \times \vec {A}) \times \hat {n}. [/tex](adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Here is my attempt, which I do believe is fine; I just want to know if there is a better way to approach the problem:

The first term, ##(\vec{A} \cdot \hat {n})\hat{n}## is a new vector ##\vec {C}## with magnitude ##A \cos \theta## in the ##\hat {n}## direction. For the second term, I simply did the operations from left-to-right, first getting ##\vec {C} = ( \hat {n} \times \vec {A})##, which if looking down on the plane made by ##\vec {A}## and ##\hat {n}##, would point upwards out of the page (I drew ##\vec {A} to be above \hat {n}##). Then, I took ##\vec {C} \times \hat {n}## and called this new vector ##\vec {D}## which has a magnitude ##A \sin \theta## and points in a direction ##\hat d##, which is perpendicular to ##\hat {n}##. So, I end up with [tex] \vec {A} = A(\cos \theta \hat {n} + \sin \theta \hat{d}). [/tex]

So, I've shown that the statement ##\vec {A} = (\vec{A} \cdot \hat {n})\hat{n} + (\hat {n} \times \vec {A}) \times \hat {n}## just breaks ##\vec {A}## up into its horizontal and vertical components. At least, that's what I make of my work. What do you guys think?

Thanks in advance!

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Kleppner/Kolenkow Vector Problem

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**