Knowing more about the discipline of mathematical neuroscience

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of finding a clear curriculum for mathematical or theoretical neuroscience, with the individual expressing confusion about whether to pursue theoretical neuroscience or physics. Traditional paths into neuroscience often involve biology or medicine, and those interested in theoretical aspects may benefit from a background in mathematical modeling or computer science. Concerns about long working hours in neuroscience, which often follow a medical model, are also raised, alongside a desire for intellectual stimulation and a balanced life. The conversation highlights the importance of identifying personal interests, such as a focus on neural networks or fundamental questions about consciousness, as a guide for future studies. Overall, the need for clarity and direction in navigating the field of neuroscience is emphasized.
  • #31
Pythagorean said:
The computer's just a tool like a calculator. You should write the models on paper, derive them mathematically, then (naturally) you're not going to want to solve the mathematics for 10000 neurons by hand so you use a numerical ODE solver or you write a snippet to compute the probabilities. Then you have to represent the data somehow (you don't just publish a bunch of numbers in a paper, you publish graphical representation) so you might as well have your code do that for you too (you're more then welcome to open up excel and do it all manuallly with your data, but it's the long route).

So while computer science is not at all the emphasis, any modern scientists (whether data mining, classifying behavior, integrating statistics, or simulating time-evolved equations) has everything to gain from knowing how to do some basic programming.

There's possibly more general, theoretical mathematics you can do, but I'd think most of them still rely on mining numerical data sets in the end... you're pretty much always going to be slower than the guy who has the same scientific knoweldge as you, but more programming skills.
ribozyme :)

That makes computational neuroscience more interesting to me. So what percentage of a computational neuroscientist's time would be used in writing down a program? If the time is little relative to other work they do then it would likely suit me.

I searched up on ribozyme real quick and that was very interesting actually, thank you.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hey dude, this is for you: http://biomath.rutgers.edu/

Check it out. If you are interested in biology related areas and physics double major. That is what I intend on doing most likely. Doing a Physics and Biomathematics double major at Rutgers. As far as your interests go, check out the curriculum for Biomaths. There are some Neuro classes in the electives, there is also a class offered by the Biomedical Engineering Dept on sensory processes focusing on the analyzation of the auditory and visual modalities. There are courses on the use of computers in biology etc etc. As far as an undergrad preperation for some type of Mathematics/Biology overlap goes I would think that the Biomaths/Physics combo would be quite good.
 
  • #33
Also if you're interested go to the Aresty Research center website and check out all of the REU's they have listed and you can further see the type of stuff that you can work on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
739
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K