Kronecker Delta Expansion: What is the Result of δijδkk?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cgstu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Expansion
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the expansion of the expression δ_ijδ_kk, specifically exploring how to interpret the indices and the implications of the Einstein summation convention. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and conceptual clarification regarding the properties of the Kronecker delta function.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant initially believes that the expansion of δ_ijδ_kk results in nine, based on their interpretation of the delta functions.
  • Another participant questions which indices are being summed over in the expression δ_ijδ_kk.
  • A participant clarifies that according to the Einstein summation convention, only repeated indices are summed, indicating that k is the only index to be summed in this case.
  • There is a suggestion that δ_kk equals 3, leading to further questioning about the final result of δ_ijδ_kk.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of the expansion and summation rules, indicating that there is no consensus on the final result of δ_ijδ_kk.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the application of the Einstein summation convention and how it affects the interpretation of the indices in the expression.

cgstu
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If given δ_ijδ_kk what would the expansion of that be? I thought it was nine but have been told that is incorrect. I know that i=j =1 else zero so I thought that the δ_kk would equal 3 times 3 from the expansion of δ_ij but that isn't the answer
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi cgstu! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

In δijδkk, which indices are you summing over? :wink:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi cgstu! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

In δijδkk, which indices are you summing over? :wink:



I guess that's what I am not sure of. I know that if i=j then the delta function =1 else delta =0 so my thinking was

δ11δ11 + δ12δ11 +
δ13δ11 + δ21δ11 +
δ22δk11 + δ23δ11 + ... where only when the indices matched is the entire function = 1

δ11δ11, δ22δ11,
δ33δ11... etc

This would give me a total of 9. However, this is incorrect and I do not understand why.
 
Hi cgstu! :smile:

Nooo …

the "Einstein summation convention" is that only repeated indices are summed over.

In this case, k is repeated (ie, there's two of them!), so you sum over k, but i and j are not repeated, so you don't sum over them, and they'll still be in the final result.

In other words, δijδkk is shorthand for ∑k δijδkk. :smile:

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_summation_convention" for details. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks tiny tim,
so if I understand correctly now the answer should be three?
 
cgstu said:
thanks tiny tim,
so if I understand correctly now the answer should be three?

No, δkk = 3, so δijδkk … ? :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K