Kronecker Delta summation (easy)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Summation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the application of the Kronecker Delta in summation, specifically addressing the expression ##\delta_{ij} \delta_{jk} = \delta_{ik}##. Participants confirm that the summation occurs over the repeated index ##j##, leading to a simplified result where only terms with matching indices contribute. The confusion arises when considering the implications of summing over indices ##i## and ##k##, which do not apply in this context. The final conclusion emphasizes that only the repeated index ##j## is summed, resulting in the correct interpretation of the Kronecker Delta.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kronecker Delta notation
  • Familiarity with index summation conventions
  • Basic knowledge of linear algebra
  • Experience with mathematical notation and expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Kronecker Delta in linear algebra
  • Learn about index notation and Einstein summation convention
  • Explore applications of Kronecker Delta in tensor calculus
  • Review examples of summation in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying linear algebra or tensor analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the nuances of index summation and Kronecker Delta applications.

member 428835
Hi PF!

As outlined in my book ##\delta_{ij} \delta_{jk} = \delta_{ik}## but don't we sum over repeated indices (and the ##j## is repeated)? Can someone explain why we do not sum in this situation?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it is summed over ##j##. Written explicitly, the sum looks like
$$
\delta_{i1} \delta_{1k} + \delta_{i2} \delta_{2k} + \ldots + \delta_{iN} \delta_{Nk}
$$
You see that if ##i\neq k##, all terms above will vanish. If ##i=k## there will be only one term surviving, therefore that sum can be written compactly as ##\delta_{ik}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
Thanks for responding blue_leaf77! Let's assume ##i,j,k## vary from ##1,2,3##. Then we have $$\delta_{11} \delta_{11} + \delta_{22} \delta_{22} + \delta_{33} \delta_{33} = 3 \neq \delta_{ik}$$

Did I miss something?
 
joshmccraney said:
Thanks for responding blue_leaf77! Let's assume ##i,j,k## vary from ##1,2,3##. Then we have $$\delta_{11} \delta_{11} + \delta_{22} \delta_{22} + \delta_{33} \delta_{33} = 3 \neq \delta_{ik}$$

Did I miss something?
Why would ##i## and ##k## be summed?

And, if you sum them on the right hand side you would get equality.
 
Last edited:
PeroK said:
Why would ##i## and ##k## be summed?
That's what blue_leaf wrote.
blue_leaf77 said:
$$
\delta_{i1} \delta_{1k} + \delta_{i2} \delta_{2k} + \ldots + \delta_{iN} \delta_{Nk}
$$

Since ##i## and ##k## can range from 1,2,3 we would have$$\delta_{11} \delta_{11} + \delta_{21} \delta_{11} + \delta_{31} \delta_{11}+ \delta_{12} \delta_{21}+ \delta_{22} \delta_{21}+ \delta_{32} \delta_{21}+\cdots + \delta_{33} \delta_{33}\\=\delta_{11} \delta_{11}+\delta_{22} \delta_{22}+\delta_{33} \delta_{33}$$ which is why I was summing.
 
joshmccraney said:
That's what blue_leaf wrote.Since ##i## and ##k## can range from 1,2,3 we would have$$\delta_{11} \delta_{11} + \delta_{21} \delta_{11} + \delta_{31} \delta_{11}+ \delta_{12} \delta_{21}+ \delta_{22} \delta_{21}+ \delta_{32} \delta_{21}+\cdots + \delta_{33} \delta_{33}\\=\delta_{11} \delta_{11}+\delta_{22} \delta_{22}+\delta_{33} \delta_{33}$$ which is why I was summing.
blue leaf summed only ##j##, which is a repeated index.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
PeroK said:
blue leaf summed only ##j##, which is a repeated index.
Ohhhhh I see now! Shoot, yea I was doing it all wrong! Thank you both!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K