- 4,796
- 32
Let (X,µ) be a measure space with µ(X) infinite. I'm trying to find an example of a pair (X,µ) and a sequence {f_n} of L^1(X,µ) functions converging uniformly to a function f such that we do not have f_n --> f in L^1(X,µ).
The discussion revolves around the concepts of L^1 convergence and uniform convergence within the context of measure theory. Participants explore examples of sequences of functions that converge uniformly but do not converge in the L^1 norm, particularly focusing on the implications of using different measure spaces.
Participants express differing views on the validity of the original statement regarding convergence in Borel spaces. While some provide examples supporting the original claim, others challenge its validity, leading to an unresolved debate on the topic.
The discussion includes assumptions about the properties of Borel measurable functions and the nature of convergence in different L^p spaces, which remain unresolved.
I don't see how you can conclude the statement is false from this.RedX said:If your measure space is Borel then I don't think this statement is true. A sequence of Borel measurable functions that has a limit converges to a Borel function.
morphism said:In fact it is possible to come up with an example satisfying the OP using X=R with Lebesgue measure. Take f_n to be a sequence of rectangles with decreasing height but increasing width, in such a way that f_n -> 0 uniformly but not in L^1. You can even rig it so that f_n doesn't converge in any L^p (1 <= p < inf).
RedX said:Doesn't L^1 mean the space of integrable functions? So why isn't f=0 in this space?
kilimanjaro said:Yes, f(x) = 0 is in L^1. The issue is whether f_n converges to f in the L^1 norm.