MHB Lacey's question at Yahoo Answers regarding a quadratic equation

AI Thread Summary
The quadratic equation -3x^2 - x - 5 = 0 can be transformed to 3x^2 + x + 5 = 0 by multiplying through by -1. The coefficients are identified as a = 3, b = 1, and c = 5, leading to a discriminant calculation of Δ = b² - 4ac = 1 - 60 = -59. Since the discriminant is negative, the equation has two complex conjugate roots. Using the quadratic formula, the roots are found to be x = (-1 ± i√59) / 6. This discussion highlights the importance of the discriminant in determining the nature of the roots of a quadratic equation.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Solve the quadratic equation?

Consider the following quadratic equation -3x^2-x-5=0

Use the discriminant b^2-4ac to determine the number of solutions of the quadratic equation

Solve using the quadratic equation usinf the formula y= (-b +/- √b^2-4ac) / 2a

Here is a link to the question:

Solve the quadratic equation? - Yahoo! Answers

I have posted a link there so the OP can find my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Lacey,

The first thing I would do is multiply through by -1, just to get rid of all those negative signs, as this will not change the value of the discriminant and roots:

$$3x^2+x+5=0$$

Now, we identify:

$$a=3,\,b=1,\,c=5$$

and the discriminant is:

$$\Delta=b^2-4ac=(1)^2-4(3)(5)=1-60=-59<0$$

Since the discriminant is negative, we know we will have two, complex conjugate roots.

Using the quadratic formula, we find that these roots are:

$$x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}=\frac{-1\pm\sqrt{-59}}{2(3)}=\frac{-1\pm i\sqrt{59}}{6}$$

To Lacey and any other guests viewing this topic, I invite and encourage you to post other such questions in our http://www.mathhelpboards.com/f2/ forum.

Best Regards,

Mark.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top